c-walker wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== Â CFJ 2586 Â
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== CFJ 2586
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== CFJ 2586 ==
Myndzi is a player.
I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack of evidence. This is clearly
not decidable based on the Caller's Evidence below, and
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== CFJ 2586 ==
Myndzi is a player.
I judge UNDETERMINED due to complete lack
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== CFJ 2586
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM,
C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
== CFJ 2586
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Oh but wait, that means the Caller has to expend some effort instead
of the CotC, a full appeals court, and the judges? How un-Agoran!
It is reasonable to expect a small modicum of
