On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 23:04 -0500, omd wrote:
> > Making incorrect statements is one issue. Attempting to ratify them is
> > another. I don't think they're the same crime, and indeed, you could be
> > punished for both.
>
> Pretty damn similar: if I hadn't intended to ratify the document,
> publis
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 22:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> The problem is that there is no gamestate that, at the time of
> publication, would cause Rule 1551 to mutate a rule a week later. Thus
> the ratification fails.
Arguments on 2926a:
There doesn't have to be one, because ratification is curren
H. CotC Murphy, please submit my interspersed comments here as arguments
on 2926a.
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 22:46 -0500, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> > This, unfortunately for em, does not work, as there is no
> > gamestate by which Rule 1551 would actually ma
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> This, unfortunately for em, does not work, as there is no
> gamestate by which Rule 1551 would actually make that change. Agoran
> precedence has long held that no entity can set up a delayed effect of this
> form, so there is no reason that rat
On 10-12-19 09:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2926
== Criminal Case 2926 (Interest Index = 0) ===
omd violated rule 2202, committing the Class 8 Crime of
Endorsing Forgery, by knowingly announcing intent to r
