On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, omd wrote:
> Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty.
>
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7435 2 scshunt Numericity
> 7436 3 scshunt De-persist commitments
I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit by 1; FOR both.
-scshunt
I vote PRESENT on proposals 7435 and 7436.
~ Roujo
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 2:07 AM, woggle wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
> On 5/12/13 17:56 , omd wrote:
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible
>> vote
> 7435 2 scshunt Numericity
AGAINST; concept fine but language could be simplified
> 7436 3 scshunt De-persist commitments
FOR
--
Walker
I vote as follows:
On 5/12/13 17:56 , omd wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible
> voters are the active first-class players at the time of this
> distribution, the vote collector is the Assessor,
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd wrote:
>
> Proposal 7435 (AI=2, Ordinary) by scshunt
> Numericity
We vote AGAINST, as the current wording is unnecessarily confusing. We
would be happy to help reword it to be both shorter and more clear.
> Proposal 7436 (AI=3, Ordinary) by scshunt
> De-persi
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, omd wrote:
> 7435 2 scshunt Numericity
AGAINST
> 7436 3 scshunt De-persist commitments
AGAINST
