Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-05 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:45, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Even a partial diversion of traffic would help. >> > I guess I don't see how. Since it would have to be a PF every one > would have to be subscribed to it anyway, so no real reduction in > message

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-05 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitra wrote: > I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two > mailing lists. > > One would be a high-signal list where "contentful" actions like > submitting proposals, delivering judgements, publishing apologies and > Canti Cygnei, and so fort

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Taral
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > I harvest 2265 for a random land. Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is something that might be improved? -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-08-04 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 17:43, comex wrote: > Enacted as Rule 2265 in category "Trophies". > I harvest 2265 for a random land. BobTHJ

BUS: Re: OFF: rulekeepor's notes on proposals 6403-6413

2009-07-31 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Proposal 6403 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by coppro >> Your Presence is Requested >> Amend Rule 2196 (Standard Classes of Agoran Decisions) by replacing >> "FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT" with "FOR and AGAINST". > > Note that th