Maud wrote:
On 3/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, this may be trivially true due to Rule 2034.
Murphy,
Since I was running out of time in which to judge, I had to submit a
version of the judgement which did not take into account your argument
regarding rule 2034. You ma
On 3/28/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assignment to Board of Appeals for CFJ 1594 (Appeal 1595a) by random draw:
Maud
I concur with Justice Cecilius's arguments. Rule 1789 does not
require the Registrar to exist in order for a Writ of FAGE to be
published, and it specifies tha
Ed Murphy wrote:
>[Do people prefer the full write-ups continue to be sent to a-o?]
The CotC is obliged to publish each judgement. "Publish" means to send
to the PF.
-zefram
Murphy wrote:
> [Do people prefer the full write-ups continue to be sent to a-o?]
Actually Murphy, I was planning on doing my own automated tool
to do the official postings, though not with the intent of
replacing your database as the main repository. Would you be able
to send/share your code,
OscarMeyr wrote:
> Pineapple Partnership c/o Zefram26 Feb 2007
By PP charter, both Zefram and I must be consulted on PP actions,
and either of us are authorized to act on behalf of PP under
certain conditions. The charter is silent on how to "communicate"
with the PP, but I'd gues
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The charter is silent on how to "communicate"
>with the PP, but I'd guess messages would need to be sent to
>both of us to be certain.
My interpretation of it is that sending a message to either of us
individually would suffice to send a message to the PP
6 matches
Mail list logo
