DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The Republic of Agora v1.2

Ed Murphy wrote: >c) A non-negative number of planned districts (NPD), Could restrict that to "non-negative rational number". >Amend Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) by replacing "voting limits on >ordinary proposals" with "the redistricting process", and by replacing >each instance of "VVLOP"

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Generalize security

Ed Murphy wrote: >Amend Rule 1688 (Power) by appending this text: > > A secured change CANNOT be performed except as allowed by an > instrument with power at least as great as that of the rule > defining that change as secured. I'm dubious about doing it this way round. You have R1

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJs on pushovers

On 10/16/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hereby call for judgement, disqualifying Eris, on the statement "within > the week after the CotC has recused with cause a judge who is a non-supine > player, e CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement". Gratuitous arguments: See ru

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The Republic of Agora v1.2

Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: c) A non-negative number of planned districts (NPD), Could restrict that to "non-negative rational number". There are currently no ways to make it irrational, and even if there were, it would only last until the end of the week. Amend Rule 2126 (Votin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Generalize security

Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: Amend Rule 1688 (Power) by appending this text: A secured change CANNOT be performed except as allowed by an instrument with power at least as great as that of the rule defining that change as secured. I'm dubious about doing it this way round.