On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, then I think that Executor can/should be modified to take into
> account the PNP and other partnerships of that nature, as I've always
> (until now) seen the PNP as its own executor.
Your argument that the PNP is its own exe
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>> In the PNP i believe that the PNP is indeed the Executor of its own
>> messages, as it has an e-mail address set up specifically for it, and
>>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:35 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: Awful proposal (AI=2)
> {
>
> Amend Rule 649 by replacing "person" with "entity" and by replacing
> the entire second paragraph with:
> Awarding or revoking a Patent Title is a secured change.
>
> Amend Rule 2162 by
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> In the PNP i believe that the PNP is indeed the Executor of its own
> messages, as it has an e-mail address set up specifically for it, and
> it sends its own messages. I see no reason that partnerships be
Read the defini
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2097
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As determined in CFJ 2074, tusho was not a player at the time this CFJ was
> called. E therefore could not have violated any rules. I rule INNOCENT.
Actually, it's probably possible to violate rules while not a player
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
>>
>> Are you trying to imply that it is not possible for non-players to
>> violate the rules?
>
> How could a non-player be bound by the rules of Agora? It would be
> c
On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/20 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
Are you trying to imply that it is not possible for non-players to
violate the rules?
How could a non-player be bound by the rules of Agora? It
2008/7/20 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
>>
>> Are you trying to imply that it is not possible for non-players to
>> violate the rules?
>
> How could a non-player be bound by the rules of Agora? It would be
> completely silly to, as a rand
On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
Are you trying to imply that it is not possible for non-players to
violate the rules?
How could a non-player be bound by the rules of Agora? It would be
completely silly to, as a random example, accuse a US Senator of
violating a rule of a
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> = Criminal Case 2088 =
>>
>>tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
>>
>> ===
Ivan Hope wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since I can no longer bring myself to care about the hundreds of random
>> messages sent to the various forums (no offense), I set my posture to supine
>> and go on hold.
>
> Same here. I announce my
avpx wrote:
> Since I can no longer bring myself to care about the hundreds of random
> messages sent to the various forums (no offense), I set my posture to supine
Fails, you're standing.
> and go on hold.
Succeeds.
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/20 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
B-but--- by CFJ 1881, tusho is not a Marvy, and so need not Dance a
Powerful Dance!
"Marvy" probably counts as a typo of "ninny" in this case.
Nice paradox...
Marvy != ninny. I see no paradox, nor trio
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Quazie wrote:
Proposal: Left in a lull
--
Add the following to R1922:
" (h) Left in a Lull, to be awarded to any player who, after at least
6 months of activity, suddenly stops playing agora. This patent title
shall be awarded by the Registrar after a player of this
On Sunday 20 July 2008 13:40:14 Quazie wrote:
> Proposal: Left in a lull
> --
> Add the following to R1922:
> " (h) Left in a Lull, to be awarded to any player who, after at least
> 6 months of activity, suddenly stops playing agora. This patent title
> shall be awarded by the Registrar after a pl
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2097
>>
>> == CFJ 2097 ==
>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2097
>
> == CFJ 2097 ==
>
>The Executor of a message that contains a CFJ is also the
>Initiator of that
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recuse myself from this case.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>
> You seem to recuse yourself from a lot of cases. If you don't want to
> judge, please just lie down.
>
> -
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recuse myself from this case.
>
> BobTHJ
You seem to recuse yourself from a lot of cases. If you don't want to
judge, please just lie down.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble
2008/7/20 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> B-but--- by CFJ 1881, tusho is not a Marvy, and so need not Dance a
> Powerful Dance!
>
"Marvy" probably counts as a typo of "ninny" in this case.
Nice paradox...
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I submit the following proposal in reference to
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/suspects.php:
H. CotC-web-maintainer Murphy, how much effort would be involved in
changing the
OscarMeyr wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I submit the following proposal in reference to
>> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/suspects.php:
>>
>
> H. CotC-web-maintainer Murphy, how much effort would be involved in
> changing the criminal record pages to include
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I am willing to rule UNIMPUGNED if tusho will kindly provide eviden
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:03 AM, comex wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
= Criminal Case 2088
=
tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> = Criminal Case 2088 =
>>
>>tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
>>
>> =
On Jul 18, 2008, at 8:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2088
= Criminal Case 2088
=
tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting.
===
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:07 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I submit the following proposal in reference to
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/suspects.php:
H. CotC-web-maintainer Murphy, how much effort would be involved in
changing the criminal record pages to include a count of GUILTY vs.
non-guilt
28 matches
Mail list logo
