> > I strongly recommend all Agorans to avoid all use of
> > in future messages except if necessary.
>
> Can we use J instead?
Tjat would just be silly.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:17 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit a proposal, adoption index 1 and title "Genocide I": "Remove
> all instances of a letter in all power-1 rules and titles of said
> rules."
>
> I strongly recommend all Agorans to avoid all use of in future
> messages exc
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:35 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A recent quote from ##nomic on freenode:
>
> 22:29 < ihope> I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. The Bell
> of Opening, the Candelabrum of Invocation, the Book of
> the Dead, and the Amulet of Yendor are singl
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologizing for silliness is a class-G offense on your sublevel.
I have an Indulgence from making the necessary prostrations last month!
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can
Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Craig Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following refresh proposal with the intent of fixing the
>> gaping flaws in contract law at present.
>
> I transfer m5 tip to teucer for a promising attempt to fix this.
NttBPF.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>>
>> Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e do
On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>>
>>
>> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>
> Sure. No worries. I agr
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
>> I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
>> Monster might actually make an interesting R
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>
>
> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e doesn't
want to be e
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
> I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
> Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
Would the Monsterkeepor be required to publish report on time on
be
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Taral wrote:
> I apologize to everyone who is not in the same silly mood as some of
> us are. It's been a very serious period, and these
> fiduciary^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H shenanigans are just a way of letting
> off stress. :)
Apologizing for silliness is a class-G offense on yo
>> On behalf of BobTHJ, I intend without objection to flip Agora's
>> recognition to Hostile.
>
> Is that even a possible act? How is Agora a foreign nomic to itself?
This is currently sub judice.
On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Pavitra wrote:
On behalf of BobTHJ, I intend without objection to flip Agora's
recognition to Hostile.
Is that even a possible act? How is Agora a foreign nomic to itself?
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
>> too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
>> it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch
ais523 wrote:
> I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
> too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
> it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of note).
> Apart from forum scams, of course, but I doubt there will be ma
Wooble wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The CEO of the Burgundy Corporation isn't empowered to unilaterally
> > transfer assets without sockholder authorization.
>
> Or maybe I'm wrong. I read the Authorize motion as implicitly
> forbidding
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:41, Charles Reiss wrote:
Bayes could just resign. Wouldn't that be easier?
-woggle
Oh.
... Yea.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 14:32, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
>
>
> Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
>
> Btw, if Bayes gets elected e will deregister and Seyab will
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:28 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ais523
> >> the Monster
> >> ehird
> >> Bayes
> >
> > A choice between ehird and ais523?
> > I
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Btw, if Bayes gets elected e will deregister and Seyab will pop up.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ais523
>> the Monster
>> ehird
>> Bayes
>
> A choice between ehird and ais523?
> I vote for Goethe.
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw t
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:24 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ais523
> > the Monster
> > ehird
> > Bayes
>
> A choice between ehird and ais523?
> I vote for Goethe.
You'd better vote for the Monster if you don't want Bayes to end u
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:14 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Conductor's Lead Sheet
>>
>> Date of this report: Tue 14 Oct 08
>> Date of last report: Wed 8 Oct 08
>>
>> Date of last manual ratification : Tue 22 Jan 08
>> Date of
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S., Illuminati, the Third Wave is in progress stage. With 2 Illuminati
> support I
> intend to remove the Blockage.
I support.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give y
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see an action there, what did you intend to do?
You're not authorized for that information.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 04:07:28 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote
> > Bayes.
>
> I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the
> Registrar's report...
Noth
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the Registrar's report...
-root
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:26 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>> Gratuitous argument: At least one version of the UNDEAD agreement
>> predates the MMI phrasing of R2173. As such, the MMI requirement of
>> SHOULD did not exist at that time. I urge the Court to a
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:01 -0400, comex wrote:
> I create the following contract:
> {
> 1. This is a public contract called the UNDAD.
> 2. Anyone can join this contract by announcement. Joining this
> contract is known as "degregistration".
> 3. comex CAN act on behalf of any party to this contr
I didn't see an action there, what did you intend to do?
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:58 -0400, "Geoffrey Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Without objection from any party to the Agoran Illuminati, I intend to
> act on behalf of the Agoran Illuminati to FNORD.
>
> -Outer Head Wooble
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:46 -0400, comex wrote:
> I nominate the AFO for Assessor.
> I nominate TNP2 for Registrar.
Fails, there's an active Registrar election at the moment.
> I nominate the PNP for Ambassador.
I doubt the PNP would be able to manage this one very well...
--
ais523
On 14 Oct 2008, at 21:26, ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:24 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
I consent. I support. I vote FOR. I endorse the Monster. I act on
behalf of BobTHJ.
Didn't Quazie try that a while ago?
--
ais523
No but you did the same for filling tickets.
I think this is trying t
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:24 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> I consent. I support. I vote FOR. I endorse the Monster. I act on
> behalf of BobTHJ.
>
Didn't Quazie try that a while ago?
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:02 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I retract my Sell Ticket to leave Bayes.
>
> Darn. I was hoping that you'd be forced to leave by equity: then I'd
> have modified the contract to allow you to join at w
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I retract my Sell Ticket to leave Bayes.
Darn. I was hoping that you'd be forced to leave by equity: then I'd
have modified the contract to allow you to join at will, but leave
only after paying VP, and accepted your Sel
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without objection from any party to the Agoran Illuminati, I intend to
> act on behalf of the Agoran Illuminati to FNORD.
>
> -Outer Head Wooble
I invoke section 38 on Wooble, making em the UNDEAD.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PRO
On 14 Oct 2008, at 20:44, Taral wrote:
You haven't been a party since the Flower Incident.
Do not talk about the Flower Incident.
Penalties have been made.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:28, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I object.
>
> I suggest Pavitra try the uncontroversial part of this change alone if
> you won't.
>
Just curious:
Why the objections? As RBOA chit holders wouldn't this change be to
your benefit?
BobTHJ
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 12:16:38 pm Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Pavitra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On behalf of BobTHJ, I intend without objection to flip Agora's
> > recognition to Hostile.
>
> *snort* Why?
Because I think it would be entertaining.
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 12:17:29 pm Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:11, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This request is only valid if it specifies a Farmer who has not
> >> yet requested subsidy this week and
On 14 Oct 2008, at 18:49, Roger Hicks wrote:
Just curious:
Why the objections? As RBOA chit holders wouldn't this change be to
your benefit?
BobTHJ
Why do you want your capitalist PIG HANDS on our beautiful communist
bank?! Hm??!
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby initiate an equity case regarding the Bayes contract, the
> parties to which are comex, ehird, and Wooble.
>
> The state of affairs not envisioned by the contract is that there
> exists no script called "bayes.py"
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:49, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:28, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I object.
>>
>> I suggest Pavitra try the uncontroversial part of this change alone if
>> you won't.
>>
> Just curious:
>
> Why the objections? As RBOA
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you should. Game custom indicates that such a
> construction nets you only one of the matching currencies, not all of
> them. If it is ambiguous, you get nothing.
Although in this case, due to the platonic nature of
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm considering this effective for the time being. I ask that those
> conducting business with the RBOA please avoid exploiting this
> loophole further until it can be repaired.
I don't think you should. Game custom indicate
Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This request is only valid if it specifies a Farmer who has not yet
>> requested subsidy this week and who at the start of this week owned fewer
>> lands than the Federal Subsidy.
>>
>> A Mill (test123) with an Operat
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:11, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This request is only valid if it specifies a Farmer who has not yet
>> requested subsidy this week and who at the start of this week owned fewer
>> lands than the Fede
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On behalf of BobTHJ, I intend without objection to flip Agora's
> recognition to Hostile.
*snort* Why?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This request is only valid if it specifies a Farmer who has not yet requested
> subsidy this week and who at the start of this week owned fewer lands than
> the Federal Subsidy.
>
> A Mill (test123) with an Operator of * and a WRV are
On Monday 13 October 2008 11:16:17 pm Charles Reiss wrote:
> I intend, with majority Comrade consent, to cause the PBA to
> register. I intend, with majority Comrade consent, to cause the PBA
> to become a Farmer.
>
> -woggle
I consent to each.
☭ Comrade Pavrita
On 14 Oct 2008, at 16:22, comex wrote:
I don't understand... where did the grudge come from? Anyway, it
clearly was not envisioned by the contract that anyone would join, so
it seems to me that equity is achieved only if Wooble leaves.
In ##nomic Wooble has admitted that it's petty spite tha
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2008, at 16:00, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I post the following Sell ticket:
>> Cost: 7VP
>> Action: cease to be a party to the Bayes contract.
> If you would like to continue this childish grudge achieving nothing
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 13:18, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I request subsidy.
>
Fails, you have too many lands.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:10, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The valid options are Wooble and ais523.
>>
>> I vote SELL(3VP).
>
> I fill this sell ticket.
>
> --Wooble
>
I consider this effective.
BobTHJ
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:27, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I destroy 77 chits in my possession.
>
> I call for judgement on the following: {{Wooble caused the Reformed
> Bank of Agora to transfer 3 crops to em a moment ago.}}
>
> Evidence:
> From the RBoA Contract:
> 6. A person CAN
On 14 Oct 2008, at 05:16, Charles Reiss wrote:
Oops?
I intend, with majority Comrade consent, to cause the PBA to register.
I intend, with majority Comrade consent, to cause the PBA to become
a Farmer.
-woggle
Any other contracts we need it to join for the currencies we trade in?
--
ehir
56 matches
Mail list logo
