On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 18:37 -0500, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Does there exist a decent Perl to Brainfuck parser / compiler?
(There probably does, as nobody in their right mind writes their code
directly in Brainfuck.)
Probably not. I'm working on a C to BF compiler based on gcc, and it's
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 00:37 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
6. Code execution is simultaneous between competitors, but [ and ]
comparisons for both competitors occur before + and - (only place
order matters in a cycle). + and - are cumulative. Every symbol takes
one cycle to execute.
Not that
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 00:37 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
e. If 1000 cycles pass with no winner as above, you both lose.
1000 seems too low, given that you have to set a value down from 128;
I'd suggest 1 or even 10. (Otherwise, a warrior could simply
create lots of fake flags with its
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 15:10 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
seems very easy
[129 +s, then a large, large amount of s]
The 129 +s kill you, as you set your own flag to 0 after 128 of them.
Then your lots of s send you off the end of the tape and you lose
again.
--
ais523
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 15:46 -0800, Taral wrote:
Activity since last report
--
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:51 - PRS revokes 5 points from ais523
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:51 - AAA revokes 3 points from ais523
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00 - Contest weekly point allowances reset
Mon, 15 Dec
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 23:25 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
woggle wrote:
Cleanliness is a public contract switch with values Unclean
(default) and Clean. Changes to Cleanliness are secured.
tracked by whom?
The Janitor.
* Murphy and the AFO agree to the following public
On 20 Dec 2008, at 16:56, Alex Smith wrote:
1000 seems too low, given that you have to set a value down from 128;
I'd suggest 1 or even 10. (Otherwise, a warrior could simply
create lots of fake flags with its time, pretty much making it
impossible for its opponent to win because the
ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 23:25 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
woggle wrote:
Cleanliness is a public contract switch with values Unclean
(default) and Clean. Changes to Cleanliness are secured.
tracked by whom?
The Janitor.
* Murphy and the AFO agree to the following
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 00:37 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
6. Code execution is simultaneous between competitors, but [ and ]
comparisons for both competitors occur before + and - (only place
order matters in a cycle). + and - are cumulative. Every symbol
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Dec 2008, at 16:56, Alex Smith wrote:
1000 seems too low, given that you have to set a value down from 128;
I'd suggest 1 or even 10. (Otherwise, a warrior could simply
create lots of fake flags with its time, pretty much making it
Looks like the contest has some reasonable rules, so a proto:
Brainfuck Joust
This is a [PROTO-] public contract and (if permitted by the Rules) a
Contest. Goethe is the contestmaster; members and Agoran courts SHOULD
generally defer to eir adjudication of disputes if the need arises.
Y'know, that wasn't actually an answer.
-- Forwarded message --
From: The Internet Oracle ora...@cs.indiana.edu
Date: Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:52 PM
Subject: The Oracle replies!
To: comexk+o...@gmail.com
The Internet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
Your question was:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This is a [PROTO-] public contract and (if permitted by the Rules) a
Contest. Goethe is the contestmaster; members and Agoran courts SHOULD
generally defer to eir adjudication of disputes if the need arises.
Goethe CAN
On 20 Dec 2008, at 22:51, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Any player (member or non-member) may submit up to three BF
programs a week
I'd like this to be relaxed a bit; it's hard to judge without
resubmitting
often.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, comex wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This is a [PROTO-] public contract and (if permitted by the Rules) a
Contest. Goethe is the contestmaster; members and Agoran courts SHOULD
generally defer to eir adjudication of
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 20 Dec 2008, at 22:51, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Any player (member or non-member) may submit up to three BF programs a week
I'd like this to be relaxed a bit; it's hard to judge without resubmitting
often.
I had the most problems balancing this one. I
In some of the results I've sent to submitters, I noticed a bug/unclarity
in instructions: if both programs terminated (reached end of code) the
interpreter was counting that under if you don't otherwise lose, you win
rule (resulting in double win) rather than the time out rule (both lose).
17 matches
Mail list logo
