As hard as I'm trying, I can't see anything illegal about this scam. Well
done. Very clever.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Warrigal wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>>> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
>>
>> See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
>> forgot two thirds of it.
>>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Now, some facts, followed by actions.
>>
>> 1. Deputizing for an office and performing the duty does not take away
>> the obligation for the officer to do that duty. Therefore, a person
>> can deputize mu
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Now, some facts, followed by actions.
>
> 1. Deputizing for an office and performing the duty does not take away
> the obligation for the officer to do that duty. Therefore, a person
> can deputize multiple times to perform the same duty (rec
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Fails, the time limit to perform the promotions/demotions has not
> expired. (I suggest you read 2160 more carefully next time).
Sure it has. The limit expired at the start of the month.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further tro
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 2. Wooble's recent proposal changed it so no announcement is needed to
>> deputize for a vacant office or wait for lateness. The Grand Poobah
>> office is vacant.
[...]
> Fails, the time limit to perform the promotions/d
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> As per private contract[1], I act on behalf of ais523, to deputize for
> the Speaker, to assign April prerogatives as follows:
>
> Goethe:Default Officeholder
> Murphy:Justiciar
> Pavitra: Wielder of Veto
> OscarMeyr: Wielder of Rubberstamp
>
Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 6186 O 0 1.0 coppro coppro Discusses Too Much
> AGAINST x 2 (s/consistency/consistently)
That's a minor spelling error that could be submitted as a Cleanliness
correction.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> Oh. Well I have no idea how to do that at all, this time the text I
> copy-pasted from the ruleset got wrapped nicely and then I just hit
> enter when I felt the line was long enough. Sorry if this made
> anyone's head hurt.
I posted this
2009/4/1 Ian Kelly :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> 2009/3/31 comex :
>>> It's not wrapped properly. :p
>>>
>> Yeah, those things are hard. Where should I put them, what is it
>> I'm actually delimiting?
>> (or is this even what you are referring to?)
>
> Delim
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Appeal 2402b
>>
>> Panelist: ais523
>> Decision: AFFIRM
>>
>> Panelist:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> 2009/3/31 comex :
>> It's not wrapped properly. :p
>>
> Yeah, those things are hard. Where should I put them, what is it
> I'm actually delimiting?
> (or is this even what you are referring to?)
Delimiters aren't that important, as lo
2009/3/31 comex :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> If there is something wrong that's easy to fix, please let me know so
>> that I can retract and edit.
>
> It's not wrapped properly. :p
>
Yeah, those things are hard. Where should I put them, what is it
I'm actua
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> If there is something wrong that's easy to fix, please let me know so
> that I can retract and edit.
It's not wrapped properly. :p
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
> ==
> Joining other nomics, take 2
> (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1)
>
> Amend the section in rule 2148 now reading:
>
> "A foreign nomic may grant certain powers (in the
> or
Goethe wrote:
> coppro is selected. coppro is installed as promotor.
coppro, are you going to continue using the PNP's scripts for recording
proposals? (If not, then I need to rewrite my record-distribution form
to scrape copy+pasted e-mails instead.)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> 6172 D 1 2.0 Goethe enough again already
> AGAINST; arguably this would simply loosen the restrictions on
> partnerships, because IIRC there's precedent that in the absence of
> rules surrounding the situation, they're persons.
W
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I create a digit ranch with a seed of 3 in coppro's possession.
> I create a WRV in coppro's possession.
I request subsidy.
I purchase a mill.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 13:27 -0400, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> And finally, the hypocrisy of partnerships is revealed here.
>>
>> Says one of the original partners of the Pineapple Partnership.
It was useful fo
Note that I'm aware my voting limit on ordinary decisions is not 8; I am
nevertheless registering 8 votes on each proposal.
>
> Proposal 6168 (Ordinary, AI=1.1, Interest=1) by Warrigal
> A Silly Bribe
FORx1, PRESENTx7
I intend, with 2 support, to convert the Agoran Decision to adopt
proposal 6168
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:33 AM, "Schrodinger's Cat" > wrote:
Has anyone ever used a blackberry to play agora?
If yes, then would you recommend that I use mine?
I use my iPhone sometimes.
--
Taral
2009/3/31 Schrodinger's Cat :
> Has anyone ever used a blackberry to play agora?
> If yes, then would you recommend that I use mine?
> (I have unlimited data plan)
I send from my iPhone. It's Just Text.
BTW, you could try Gmail's mobile web interface or something too.
2009/3/31 comex :
> But now that the PNP's out of office, maybe it finally is time for the
> sunset of partnerships.
>
RIP Bayes killed by one of its parents
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Schrodinger's Cat
wrote:
> Has anyone ever used a blackberry to play agora?
> If yes, then would you recommend that I use mine?
> (I have unlimited data plan)
I don't see how the email client you use would really be relevant at
all, as long as it's as functional
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 13:27 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > And finally, the hypocrisy of partnerships is revealed here.
>
> Says one of the original partners of the Pineapple Partnership.
>
> But now that the PNP's out of office, maybe it finally i
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> And finally, the hypocrisy of partnerships is revealed here.
Says one of the original partners of the Pineapple Partnership.
But now that the PNP's out of office, maybe it finally is time for the
sunset of partnerships.
Has anyone ever used a blackberry to play agora?
If yes, then would you recommend that I use mine?
(I have unlimited data plan)
--
Sent from my mobile device
-- Schrodinger's Cat
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> AGAINST; arguably this would simply loosen the restrictions on
> partnerships, because IIRC there's precedent that in the absence of
> rules surrounding the situation, they're persons.
No, because after the precedent we adopted R2150.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Warrigal wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
>
> See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
> forgot two thirds of it.
>
> I change my nickname to Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Tho
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 20:06 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> Agora can join B now. It just needs to post to spoon-business that it
> has decided to become a faction.
Note for Agorans who aren't B players: B decided that Agora fit the B
definition of a contract. This is unlikely to have an effect on
Warrigal wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I change my nickname to Thomas O'Malley.
>
> See, this is what happens when you do things at 2:44 in the morning. I
> forgot two thirds of it.
>
> I change my nickname to Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas
> O'Malley, abb
31 matches
Mail list logo
