Re: DIS: RE: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: >>> (The whole setup seems rather suboptimal to me, as I have to try to >>> reflect everything that happens contract-wise on the wiki, and would >>> have to check anyway, as Notary, to ensure everything is up-to-date. >>> Therefore, the wiki adds no real convenience to me, as people n

DIS: Re: BUS: moronservi...@gmail.com

2009-04-05 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Luke Benner wrote: > I am requesting to join Agora. The name I will be writing under will be > Randy Olshaw. Lessee, by Rule 217, "to join Agora" is the same as "to register", so you're requesting registration, which, by Rule 869, makes you a player. I think. Wel

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Attachments

2009-04-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2009-04-06, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >> > I CFJ on the following statement: An officer CAN submit an attachment in >> > lieu of a plain text email to satisfy his report provided the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Attachments

2009-04-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein >> wrote: >> > I CFJ on the following statement: An officer CAN submit an attachment in >> > lieu of a plain text email to satisfy hi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Attachments

2009-04-05 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > I CFJ on the following statement: An officer CAN submit an attachment in > > lieu of a plain text email to satisfy his report provided the attachment > in > > question contains all nec

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: Attachments

2009-04-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: An officer CAN submit an attachment in > lieu of a plain text email to satisfy his report provided the attachment in > question contains all necessary materials. What kind of attachment? Plain-text, pdf, pr

DIS: Re: BUS: Status of Some Second-Class Person

2009-04-05 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > As Taral's report contradicts itself, I'm unsure of the status of the > following second-class persons: > > People's Bank of Agora > Protection Racket > Reformed Bank of Agora > > Does anyone know whether these are active players, inactive pl

DIS: Re: BUS: [AAA] catchup

2009-04-05 Thread Sean Hunt
Geoffrey Spear wrote: > --SoA Wooble I request subsidy.

Re: DIS: RE: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2009-04-06, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> root wrote: >>> I tried to edit my own page on the Notary wiki a few weeks ago and was >>> unable to. >> >> You have to ask Murphy for edit permissions to be able to edit the wiki. >> (The whole setup seems rather suboptimal to me, as I have to

Re: DIS: RE: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > root wrote: >> I tried to edit my own page on the Notary wiki a few weeks ago and was >> unable to. > > You have to ask Murphy for edit permissions to be able to edit the wiki. > (The whole setup seems rather suboptimal to me, as I have to try to > reflect everything that happens

DIS: RE: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Alexander Smith
root wrote: > I tried to edit my own page on the Notary wiki a few weeks ago and was > unable to. You have to ask Murphy for edit permissions to be able to edit the wiki. (The whole setup seems rather suboptimal to me, as I have to try to reflect everything that happens contract-wise on the wiki,

DIS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > This is a combined Notary's weekly and monthly report. This message takes no > actions apart from to publish required information; in particular, > everything below is "quoted" and so is not an attempt by me to take an > action even if it looks

DIS: Re: OFF: [Notary] Weekly and Monthly Contract Reports

2009-04-05 Thread Sean Hunt
Alex Smith wrote: > *PerlNomic Partnership* > *Parties* > > * Dvorak Herring > * Wooble > * ais523 > * RainerWasserfuhr

DIS: Re: BUS: Actually paying attention to the AAA

2009-04-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 18:09 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > I mill 8-7=1, 7*8=1, 7*8=1, 5+7=1, 8/8=1, 8/8=1. > > I harvest each of the following ID numbers of ordinary proposals for 2 > y-points each: > > 6168 6169 6176 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 > > I harvest each of the following ID numbers of democr