ehird wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Sean Hunt :
>> I object. Activity is needed because, in the case of non-embassy
>
> But what about
Fnord!
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote to the discussion forum:
>> I consent publicly.
>
> No, you don't.
Doesn't need to be to a public forum. I'd consented in ##nomic but
decided I'd better do it somewhere where people pay more attention.
Sean Hunt wrote to the discussion forum:
> I consent publicly.
No, you don't.
Warrigal wrote:
> I intend, with the consent of all parties to ?, to append the
> following sentence to it: "Any party to ? may act on its behalf with
> the consent of all other parties." I intend, with the consent of all
> parties to ?, to cause ? to publish the message "Happy Birthday,
> Agora! I
2009/6/29 Sean Hunt :
> I object. Activity is needed because, in the case of non-embassy
But what about
New draft: (I don't agree to this yet)
1. Purpose of the Foundation
This is a public contract named the Charity Foundation. The purpose of
this contract is to let assets that are not otherwise used come to
benefit the ones who deserve or need them. Parties to this contract
are known as Helpful. Pl
Warrigal wrote:
> I intend, with the consent of all parties to ə, to append the
> following sentence to it: "Any party to ə may act on its behalf with
> the consent of all other parties." I intend, with the consent of all
> parties to ə, to cause ə to publish the message "Happy Birthday,
> Agora! I
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 00:08 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I'm happy for any thoughts on names, by the way. English is not my
> first language and I'm not into charity or any kind of business or
> organisation, so I just picked names that sounded good.
I do like the idea of charity; but, I think
2009/6/30 Sean Hunt :
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I intend, without party objection, to amend 3-Scroll Rodney as follows:
>> - Change the Frequency of the Scrolls of Concentration and
>> Hallucination to 0.12 each.
>> - Add a new scroll, the Scroll of Fire, with frequency 0.06. When read,
>> the
2009/6/29 Benjamin Caplan :
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> This is a public contract named the Charity Foundation. Parties to
>> this contract are known as Helpful.
> Intriguing. I've never seen a contract demonym that was an adjective
> rather than a noun.
>
>> Departement to the Charity Foundation,
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> This is a public contract named the Charity Foundation. Parties to
> this contract are known as Helpful.
Intriguing. I've never seen a contract demonym that was an adjective
rather than a noun.
> Departement to the Charity Foundation, if possible. Helpful players
Departmen
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> This feels wrong somehow. The first two paragraphs appear to be arguing
>> for TRUE, but then the last one contradicts their conclusions without
>> refuting their arguments.
>>
>> In light of the reasoning presented in the second paragraph of this
>> ju
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:19 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Sean Hunt :
> > I award myself a Magenta Ribbon.
> >
> > I CFJ {I have a Magenta Ribbon.}
> >
> > Happy birthday, Agora!
> >
> > I award myself a Magenta Ribbon.
>
> Seconded, except for the CFJ.
>
You probably want to make that a bit
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> This feels wrong somehow. The first two paragraphs appear to be arguing
> for TRUE, but then the last one contradicts their conclusions without
> refuting their arguments.
>
> In light of the reasoning presented in the second paragraph of this
> judgement, how do you find
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Yep, it's the "generally" that's confusing me here, as I can't figure
> out if it implies "there's an entity that 'e' generally refers to",
> which is false.
Well, it's certainly confusing even if it's not because e generally
referred to another
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> Also gains of most ribbons and some Notes would go to me.
>
> *sigh* see CFJ 1520, last two paragraphs of judge's arguments, please.
>
> -G.
I said /would/, not really thinking that the scam would work.
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> >>> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
> >>
> >> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> Also gains of most ribbons and some Notes would go to me.
*sigh* see CFJ 1520, last two paragraphs of judge's arguments, please.
-G.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>>> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronoun 'e' might
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM,
C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> I change my name to "2.71828183...
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronou
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>
> No, because technically I believe e changed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>>
>>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronou
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>
> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
> singular pronoun 'e' might have some *slight* chance of being "a name
>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
singular pronoun 'e' might have some *slight* chance of being "a name
that has generally been used to refer to another entity within t
2009/6/29 Craig Daniel :
>> music-currency [which can only mean Notes, in this context] to .kreig.
>> [which is the Lojban form of my real name, and the name by which I am
>> known in the Lojban community], who is .tefkros. [my preferred
>> Lojbanization of "teucer", based on the original Greek for
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 20:12 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/6/21 Ed Murphy :
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2605
> >
> > == CFJ 2605 ==
> >
> >Bdi ta Askatasuna joined Warrigal's unnamed contract.
> >
> >
> music-currency [which can only mean Notes, in this context] to .kreig.
> [which is the Lojban form of my real name, and the name by which I am
> known in the Lojban community], who is .tefkros. [my preferred
> Lojbanization of "teucer", based on the original Greek form of said
> name, which is Фе
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:06, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Roger Hicks :
>> I spend Db D B to gain a Bb note.
>>
>> I spend 3 Db notes, 2 E notes, 5 Eb notes, 2 G notes, 2 A notes, 2 Ab
>> notes, and 9 Bb notes (...)
>>
>> BobTHJ
>>
> According to my records, you only have 7 Bb notes - 6 as
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, comex wrote:
> [Various errors in Card proposal]
Arggh... will teach me not to try editing a big proposal in airport lounges
on a crummy borrowed laptop just to get it out in time for birthday. Looks
like a few cards will be broken out of the gate but not dangerously, but c
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> It's the sort of sneaky action that makes it look like you're trying to
>> hide something; not necessarily bad form, but it'll make people
>> suspicious.
>
> and/or make the recordkeepor m
2009/6/29 Jonatan Kilhamn :
> 2009/6/29 Geoffrey Spear :
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonatan
>> Kilhamn wrote:
>>> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37 56 47 82 72 48 74 696
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jonatan
>> Kilhamn wrote:
>>> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> It's the sort of sneaky action that makes it look like you're trying to
> hide something; not necessarily bad form, but it'll make people
> suspicious.
and/or make the recordkeepor miss your action, causing em to violate
the rules when publishin
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:08 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> Thanks for explaining that (to everyone that did). And are game action
> in your sig considered bad form? Sorry if they are, that was a one
> off.
It's the sort of sneaky action that makes it look like you're trying to
hide something; not necess
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn wrote:
>> But is it a good idea?
>
> As one of several players with effectively no assets, it sounds like a
> great idea ;).
Cards have a minimum salary for every player; should help this a lot
(we should h
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:42 +0100, C-walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, < Wooble wrote:
>> > Happy Birthday, Agora!
>>
>> I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
>
> We do for almost everything, the Birthday's an exce
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
> at most 5 proposals per author per week) for the X axis.
Considering we can know right before the week starts how many I must
legally distribute, it's surprising that people gu
c-walker wrote:
> I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
Agora's birthday goes by GMT +1200 because First Speaker Michael's
initiation message was sent at 00:04:30 GMT +1200 (Rule 1727).
c-walker wrote:
> I guess 8 CFJs for the next week for which I haven't already guessed.
NttPF.
> Murphy, does the proposal guessing system work by the number submitted
> or the number distributed?
4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
at most 5 proposals per author
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:27 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> >> If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
> >> have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real. And since
> >>
2009/6/29 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn wrote:
>> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37 56 47 82 72 48 74 696
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn wrote:
>> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37 56 47 82 72 48 74 696
>
> I find
2009/6/29 C-walker :
> On Mon, Jun 29, < Wooble wrote:
>> Happy Birthday, Agora!
>
> I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
>
> rock in stormy seas
> Agora lives on, sane
> bring on next summer
>
> --
> C-walker
> who creates a Magenta ribbon in eir possession
>
We do
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:42 +0100, C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, < Wooble wrote:
> > Happy Birthday, Agora!
>
> I thought we went by UTC time? Anyway, Happy Birthday, Agora!
We do for almost everything, the Birthday's an exception. Also, putting
game actions in your sig?
--
ais523
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37 56 47 82 72 48 74 696
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> Total 73 31 75 28 73 37 56 47 82 72 48 74 696
I find it hard to believe that after all the rec
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:35 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of me not wanting to become
> inactive due to bad stuff happening to, I dunno, maybe my crops or
> notes or something. But it seems not, and I think that I will at least
> have time to realize that I'm g
2009/6/29 C-walker :
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn wrote:
>> There's no bad stuff happening when going inactive, so that I can do
>> it for just a few days?
>
> I agree to the following {{ This becomes a contract when Tiger joins
> and ceases to be a contract if e leaves it.
Murphy wrote:
> Guesses for June 22-28 Proposals CFJs
> ---
> Tue 16 Jun 16:35:58 c. 15 15
> Sun 21 Jun 08:50:09 c-walker 16 9
> Sun 21 Jun 08:54:13 Yally 8 12
> * 4 x-points to c-walker
>
> * 8
2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
>> have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real. And since
>> I have made it anyway, I'll post it for the new conductor to use
>>
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:18 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
> have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real. And since
> I have made it anyway, I'll post it for the new conductor to use
> should e be installed soon.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:04 AM, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> This has been reported as undistributable in the past two proposal
>> pool reports, when I remember spending D to make it Distributable on
>> Fri, Jun 12, at 5:31 PM, to be exact. I CoE that this
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> But is it a good idea?
As one of several players with effectively no assets, it sounds like a
great idea ;).
--
C-walker
If Conductor is still vacant when Murphy's and BobTHJ's win attempts
have settled, I'll deputise to publish this report for real. And since
I have made it anyway, I'll post it for the new conductor to use
should e be installed soon.
Ex-Conductor's Lead Sheet
Date of this report: Mon 29 Jun 2009
2009/6/29 Roger Hicks :
> I spend Db D B to gain a Bb note.
>
> I spend 3 Db notes, 2 E notes, 5 Eb notes, 2 G notes, 2 A notes, 2 Ab
> notes, and 9 Bb notes (...)
>
> BobTHJ
>
According to my records, you only have 7 Bb notes - 6 as of the last
report on 17 June, none gained since then except your
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 08:43 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I spend G# F# F to gain E.
> I spend G# F# F to gain E.
I'm not entirely sure the Note math works here. G# to F# is two
semitones, F to E is one. Or have I misread what you were trying to do?
--
ais523
2009/6/29 C-walker :
> A player CAN flip a specified Interested proposal to
> Distributable without a number of objections equal to -II + 4
> (where II is the Interest Index of the specified proposal). A
> player CAN flip a specified Disinterested proposal to
> Distributabl
2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> As I'm trying to sort out who gained notes for awarding points - who
>> was this constanza person, and what happened? Could someone who
>> actually understood this scam please explain?
>
> constanza was presumably
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 17:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> As I'm trying to sort out who gained notes for awarding points - who
> was this constanza person, and what happened? Could someone who
> actually understood this scam please explain?
constanza was presumably a third-party who agreed to he
2009/6/20 Alex Smith :
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 12:16 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ryan Ursenbach wrote:
>> > I agree to all of those contracts
>> >
>> > Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >
>> > Agree to these instead:
>> >
>> > {
>> > I pledge that I may be referred to in Agora as "costanza". Any first
2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
>> 6388 D 1 2.0 Tiger No more sneaky contestmasters
> AGAINST, doesn't actually fix the problem (nothing says that
> second-class persons CANNOT become players)
Oh. I'm sure that I thought this through and was certain that id did
fix the problem when I wrote it,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 17:46, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 8. At any time, a nomic may
>> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk
>> by announcement. Whenever a nomic
>> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjks,
>> they are pledging thei
2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 05:10 -0700, Taral wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> > to satisfy the Winning Condition of Musicianship, and I win by
>> > Musicianship.
>> Congrats. :)
>> > Happy birthday Agora, by the way!
>> Happy birthday Agora!
>
> I
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 05:10 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > to satisfy the Winning Condition of Musicianship, and I win by
> > Musicianship.
>
> Congrats. :)
>
> > Happy birthday Agora, by the way!
>
> Happy birthday Agora!
>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I figured out how to get this into the database, but why does
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/status.php (newly modified to
> specify charset=utf-8 rather than charset=iso-8859-1) render it
> incorrectly by default?
Either change your default
2009/6/29 Alex Smith :
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> As I have said, I don't know for sure when I will next suddenly
>> disappear for over a week, so I leave all contests except AAA and the
>> Cookie Jar.
>
> If you disappear for a couple of days, and I notice, I'll
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:20 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> As I have said, I don't know for sure when I will next suddenly
> disappear for over a week, so I leave all contests except AAA and the
> Cookie Jar.
If you disappear for a couple of days, and I notice, I'll intend to make
you inactive, t
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 00:08 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2606
>
> == Equity Case 2606 ==
This omits my gratuitous arguments (that it would be more equitable to
keep the total number of scrolls
2009/6/29 Ed Murphy :
> I figured out how to get this into the database, but why does
> http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/status.php (newly modified to
> specify charset=utf-8 rather than charset=iso-8859-1) render it
> incorrectly by default?
Your HTTP server is sending a Content-Type header that'
Warrigal wrote:
> I act on behalf of ə to register ə.
I figured out how to get this into the database, but why does
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/status.php (newly modified to
specify charset=utf-8 rather than charset=iso-8859-1) render it
incorrectly by default? Here's the main part of the s
70 matches
Mail list logo
