On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Clearly this means "I hereby judge {comex SHALL ensure that judicial
> panels of which e is a member are not assigned as judge in the appeal of
> any judicial case." (The bit about the contract is a holdover from the
> days when equity judge
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> My specific complaints are as follows:
>>>
>>> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
>>> platonically act on behalf of a player.
>>> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
>>> -
Elliott Hird wrote:
> 14:53 ehird: fungot: Punish comex.
> 14:54 fungot: ehird: there is an order. it shall be its judge by
> announcement. quorum for an appelate judge is recused, and an
> indication is a contract
> Pastiching, inferring and general munging left as an exercise to the reader.
Cle
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> My specific complaints are as follows:
>>
>> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
>> platonically act on behalf of a player.
>> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
>> - The President has not rece
Sean Hunt wrote:
> My specific complaints are as follows:
>
> - The IBA does not have a functioning offer system as it cannot
> platonically act on behalf of a player.
> - The Rates of assets have not been kept updated.
> - The President has not recently published a report.
The
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> I'm back, and I see I missed being included in that Throne Song. Damn.
> I would support the intent to name coppro Bard, but I'm not sure -
> would coming off hold just upset the line of succession even more?
> I'll be away again next Tuesday, so maybe it's not even worth g
Tiger wrote:
> Am I missing something, or does the sentences of that pledge conflict
> with each other? the first sentence is clearly meant to allow the
> ambassador to flip the recognition emself (w/o objection, or whatever
> it is) and then withdraw the proposal, but e can't do that anyway
> sinc
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 02:40, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I transfer a prop from BobTHJ, for re-platonicizing something that was
>> pragmatic for a reason, to Rodlen, for being someone I chose
>> completely at random.
>
> Hear, hear. Either deal them,
2009/7/17 C-walker :
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> I'd like to see the EUDI (http://eudi.forumotion.net/) flipped to
>> Neutral. They're not *primarily* a nomic -- they're a player guild in an
>> online game I play -- but they have a formal charter that provides for
2009/7/18 ais523 :
> I suggest feeding the Agoran ruleset to fungot and taking the first
> output that's reasonably recognisable as a punishment.
14:53 ehird: ^style agora
14:53 fungot: Selected style: agora (a large selection of Agora rules,
both current and historical)
14:53 ehird: fungot: Punis
2009/7/18 Elliott Hird :
> I suppose, then, that you either prefer your magazines and the like to
> be set at around 7-8pt; either that, or you put your head right next
> to the monitor?
Actually, I might know why you find it big enough: your monitor may be
pack, say, 84 pixels into an inch (a com
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 14:50 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/7/18 Taral :
> > I'm still not convinced that any other judgement is in the best
> > interests of the parties and the game in general. Unless, of course,
> > the parties wish to suggest some more adequate remedy?
>
> Some bizarre punish
2009/7/18 Taral :
> I'm still not convinced that any other judgement is in the best
> interests of the parties and the game in general. Unless, of course,
> the parties wish to suggest some more adequate remedy?
Some bizarre punishment in the spirit of the text? :-)
2009/7/18 Roger Hicks :
> Because I'm really rather fond of the 10pt type. If that poses a
> problem you could always set your screen resolution to 640x480. Then
> it will be plenty big enough.
>
> BobTHJ
>
I suppose, then, that you either prefer your magazines and the like to
be set at around 7-8
c-walker wrote:
> Murphy wrote:
>> c-walker wrote:
>>> I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for this week.
>> Ineffective, too late in the week.
>
> I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for the next week in which I can guess.
That doesn't work either.
c-walker wrote:
> I guess 9 proposals and 12 CFJs for this week.
Ineffective, too late in the week.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Invalid, guesses must now be in by the end of Friday (UTC).
Bah, what idiot made that change?
Oh. Right.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I transfer a prop from BobTHJ, for re-platonicizing something that was
> pragmatic for a reason, to Rodlen, for being someone I chose
> completely at random.
Hear, hear. Either deal them, or don't.
--
Tar
"Please let me know if there's a
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Addendum: I just went back to 2005, which had the effect of putting Taral
> on the list at #18: on 12-Mar-06 Taral held a winning hand of Cards. Well
> done, Taral!
... I did? :)
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble
I'm still not convinced that any other judgement is in the best
interests of the parties and the game in general. Unless, of course,
the parties wish to suggest some more adequate remedy?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
20 matches
Mail list logo
