2009/8/17 Ed Murphy :
> What's the point of playing Debate-o-Matic before it gets
> distributed? E may as well retract and resubmit.
To exploit a bug, obviously.
G. wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
>> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
>
> Oh. Clever.
>
> [gets popcorn and sits
2009/8/17 comex :
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>
> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
`_`
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 13:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 13:57, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:44, comex wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distribut
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>
> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
Oh. Clever.
[gets popcorn and sits down in front row]
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 13:57, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:44, comex wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>>>
>>> I play Committee to make it undistributabl
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:44, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>>
>> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
>> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> True, it should probably be something like
> "A person CAN, without three objections, cause a contract [to which e
> is party] to become a Bank"
> (do we need to restrict it to parties?)
I don't think it's necessary considering the W3O.
--
-
c. wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a
means of asset exchange between players. Any party to a contract CAN cause
that
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:44, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, comex wrote:
>> I play Distrib-u-Matic to make it distributable.
>
> I play Committee to make it undistributable.
> I play Debate-o-Matic to make it democratic.
>
And the objective is?
BobTHJ
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:43 PM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become
>> voters in an emergency session.
>
> Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class
> players... but I think this
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become
> voters in an emergency session.
Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class
players... but I think this would actually be a good thing, though
there might be
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a
>>> means of asset exchange between players. Any party to a contract CAN cause
>>> that
>>> contract to be
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM,
C-walker wrote:
> An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2)
> Amend Rule 1950 by replacing its entire text with:
Oh, and this needs AI 3.
--
-c.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM,
C-walker wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and play Distrib-u-matic to make it
> Distributable.
>
> {{
>
> An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2)
>
> [[ This proposal turns Senatorship into a switch, clarifies dependent
> actions with only specific types of
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:03, C-walker wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and play Distrib-u-matic to make it
> Distributable.
>
> {{
>
> An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2)
>
> [[ This proposal turns Senatorship into a switch, clarifies dependent
> actions with only specific types of pl
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> No, that's everything. I seem to have been dealt only one of the above
>> draws, though.
>>
> Here's the records that correspond to those earned draws:
>
> Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:25 - C-Walker is dealt the following card from the
> deck of Justice
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:51, C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker
>> wrote:
>>> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
>>> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker
> wrote:
>> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
>> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I just
>> judged.
>>
> Appeal cases don't generate dra
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:08, C-walker wrote:
> I believe I am owed two more Justice cards, one for the case which was
> recently remanded to woggle, and one for the inquiry case which I just
> judged.
>
Appeal cases don't generate draws. Here's the DoJ draws I show you
having earned recently:
Sa
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> These didn't come through on the automated e-mail (though they did
> give me a good clue as to where to look for this weird e-mail bug). If
> I have not already I perform the actions indicated by the following
> log entries:
>
> Sun, 16 Aug 20
comex wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> A Bank is a public contract whose purpose includes facilitating a
>> means of asset exchange between players. Any party to a contract CAN cause
>> that
>> contract to become a Bank without three objections.
>
> Which contract?
22 matches
Mail list logo
