Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2664 assigned to c.

2009-09-01 Thread Pavitra
comex wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2664 === �CFJ 2664 (Interest Index = 2) � � �The Ambassador has a weekly report

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Proposal: Kill it with fire

2009-09-01 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Well, crap.  H. Majority Leader ais523, would you please veto this when it comes up for vote, so Rule 2198 won't block it? I'm pretty sure the veto changes the adoption index of the decision, not of the proposal.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Quick stuff

2009-09-01 Thread ais523
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 20:04 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: comex wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: I am not a member of the PBA, and the LPRS no longer exists. The wiki says you are: http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/the-people-s-bank-of-agora ais523

DIS: Re: BUS: Pavitra's Actions (automated)

2009-09-01 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 17:50, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:20 PM, pidge...@gmail.com wrote: NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of Pavitra as permitted by contract, and may in turn

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6474-6475

2009-09-01 Thread comex
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: 6475 D 0 2.0 c.                  Simple satisfaction fix FOR (no-op anyway if 6470 passes first) I strongly hope it doesn't. -- -c.

DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Roger Hicks
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 19:57, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 10-16. Invalid. Does not specify the crime of Tardiness. BobTHJ

DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Roger Hicks
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 16:57, Elliott Hirdpenguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 17-23. Invalid. Does not specify the crime of Tardiness. Also to note: I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread comex
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: For the week of Aug 10-16 game custom dictates I should not be penalized due to recently assuming the office. I disagree, half a week should be more than enough time. I completed the Anarchist's weekly

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Caste report

2009-09-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: XTiger (+2) X Chief Whip - number of votes gained after name CoE: you're not the Chief Whip anymore. Also, a standing request to whoever is the Chief Whip: please point it out when making use

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Caste report

2009-09-01 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
2009/9/1 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com: Wooble wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: XTiger (+2) X Chief Whip - number of votes gained after name CoE: you're not the Chief Whip anymore. Also, a standing request to whoever is the Chief

DIS: Position

2009-09-01 Thread Pavitra
I just noticed that R208 uses the term position, which has since acquired a formal meaning in the Rules. Does this break anything?

Re: DIS: Position

2009-09-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: I just noticed that R208 uses the term position, which has since acquired a formal meaning in the Rules. Does this break anything? I don't think so. The formal definition doesn't attempt to exceed its intended domain (certain cards and their owners), so outside that domain, the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Taral
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: For the week of Aug 10-16 game custom dictates I should not be penalized due to recently assuming the office. I disagree, half a week should be more than enough

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Sean Hunt
Roger Hicks wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 19:57, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: I publish the following NoV: BobTHJ violated R2143 (Power-1) by failing to complete the Anarchist's weekly duties in the week of August 10-16. Invalid. Does not specify the crime of Tardiness. BobTHJ a) NTTPF

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, comex wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: For the week of Aug 10-16 game custom dictates I should not be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Sean Hunt
Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, comex wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:52 AM, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote: For the week of Aug 10-16 game custom dictates I

DIS: Re: BUS: [IBA] Report

2009-09-01 Thread Roger Hicks
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 21:23, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: === Industrial Bank Agora Report Date of this report: 1 September 2009 President of the IBA: comex

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: I called a high-II criminal case covering this very issue but with a shorter period. The fact is that game custom doesn't take precedent over the rules; while I actually proposed reinserting such an exception as part of a larger rework of offices, that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: NoVs

2009-09-01 Thread Sean Hunt
Kerim Aydin wrote: On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: I called a high-II criminal case covering this very issue but with a shorter period. The fact is that game custom doesn't take precedent over the rules; while I actually proposed reinserting such an exception as part of a larger rework

DIS: Re: BUS: [IBA] Report

2009-09-01 Thread Roger Hicks
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 19:21, comexcom...@gmail.com wrote: This would be so much nicer if I hadn't deleted orange.  Maybe I should just give up and make you President, you're tracking everything anyway. FYI, I'm hoping to borrow your idea of having the system capture a-b and a-o messages and