On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 17:50, comex<com...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:20 PM, <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> NOTE: Actions taken in this message are on behalf of Pavitra as permitted
>>> by contract, and may in turn be on behalf of other recordkeepors and/or
>>> officeholders.
>>>
>>> {
>>> Pavitra is dealt the following card(s) from the deck of Justice, but each
>>> such draw is only valid if e is still owed a draw from this deck : Drop
>>> Your Weapon
>>> }
>>> Reason: Self-initiated draw(s)
>>
>> CoE: Pavitra cannot create a card in eir possession because e is not
>> the Insulator.
>>
> Denied. E acted on my behalf via the terms of the BJS contract.
Not without eir message explicitly saying e does so, e can't.
