Pavitra wrote:
Come to think of it, I'm unlikely to use Minister without Portfolio
either. I think the Major Arcana are tradeable.
They are.
-coppro
ais523 wrote:
> Because the banks are kind-of weird to understand right now, let's
> settle for some old-fashioned haggling.
>
> I'm willing to consider trading the following cards for something of
> roughly equal value:
>
> Distrib-u-matics
> Kill Bills (redundant for me atm)
> Roll Calls
>
> A
Ian Kelly wrote:
> http://agorathemovie.com/
>
> Strangely, it doesn't seem to cover the Mousetrap or any of Agora's
> other defining moments.
When was the last time any movie adapation was remotely faithful to the
source material?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Interesting. Making random choices is one of those things that used to
> be covered by the Rules, but it was repealed because a precedent was
> straightforward. All of R1079's (a-e) below are reasonable precedents
> where the rules are silent (especially as (e) defers to the
Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
(d) For the purposes of this Rule, tossing a platonic solid that
is not specially weighted has a probability distribution
among the possible outcomes that is reasonably close to
unifor
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> (d) For the purposes of this Rule, tossing a platonic solid that
>> is not specially weighted has a probability distribution
>> among the possible outcomes that is reasonably close to
>> uniform.
>
> M
Kerim Aydin wrote:
(d) For the purposes of this Rule, tossing a platonic solid that
is not specially weighted has a probability distribution
among the possible outcomes that is reasonably close to
uniform.
Mmm... vague definition of "toss".
-coppro
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 15:56 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> Either the rule is broken platonically (UNDETERMINED is appropriate), or
>> it's broken pragmatically (it's possible to exploit it as I described).
>> In no case is it working properly.
>
> I see what you mean
Ed Murphy wrote:
Wooble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
With as easy as it is to democratize and/or veto a proposal using
cards why not just make all proposal-decisions ordinary by default?
Because then when someone breaks dependent actions you can just submit
N+1 hi
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> With as easy as it is to democratize and/or veto a proposal using
>> cards why not just make all proposal-decisions ordinary by default?
>
> Because then when someone breaks dependent actions you can just submit
> N+1 high-AI p
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> With as easy as it is to democratize and/or veto a proposal using
> cards why not just make all proposal-decisions ordinary by default?
Because then when someone breaks dependent actions you can just submit
N+1 high-AI proposals where N is the n
2009/9/8 Aaron Goldfein :
> Well, you know movies these days; they're nothing but sex and violence.
You forgot drug abuse.
Also Poland.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:12, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Three-tier voting limits
> (AI = 3, please)
>
With as easy as it is to democratize and/or veto a proposal using
cards why not just make all proposal-decisions ordinary by default?
BobTHJ
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 08:52, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/9/5 Jonatan Kilhamn :
>> 2009/9/4 Roger Hicks :
>>> I play Lobbyist x4 to increase my caste to Alpha.
>>>
>> Fails, Lobbyist can only increase other players' caste.
>>
>> --
>> -Tiger
>>
> Which means that you had 11 cards when auditing y
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> http://agorathemovie.com/
>
> Strangely, it doesn't seem to cover the Mousetrap or any of Agora's
> other defining moments.
>
> -root
>
Well, you know movies these days; they're nothing but sex and violence.
Because the banks are kind-of weird to understand right now, let's
settle for some old-fashioned haggling.
I'm willing to consider trading the following cards for something of
roughly equal value:
Distrib-u-matics
Kill Bills (redundant for me atm)
Roll Calls
Anyone who wants any of these, sugges
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 15:56 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> Either the rule is broken platonically (UNDETERMINED is appropriate), or
> it's broken pragmatically (it's possible to exploit it as I described).
> In no case is it working properly.
I see what you mean... I'm inclined to think it's broken plato
17 matches
Mail list logo
