agora-requ...@listserver.tue.nl wrote:
* Shrink Potion
A player CAN play a Shrink Potion, specifying a player. That
player's Hand Limit is decreased by 10% (rounded up).
This rounds up the shrinkage; that is, the Hand Limit is decreased to
90% of its previous state, rounded
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
Actually, based on the recent outage, I was looking at the precedent
(CFJ 2058) again, and as far as I can tell the judge's verdict
contradicts eir arguments. Therefore, another precedent on the matter
would likely be very welcome.
Revisits aren't a bad
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
Actually, based on the recent outage, I was looking at the precedent
(CFJ 2058) again, and as far as I can tell the judge's verdict
contradicts eir arguments. Therefore, another precedent on the matter
would likely be very welcome.
Revisits aren't a bad
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 00:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
(2678 and 2679 are above ə's rank. Rotation and further assignments
coming up shortly, followed by resolution of proposals.)
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2680
== CFJ 2680
I also forgot to take CFJ 2680's favoring into account. This one was
clearly not illegal, though (I couldn't assign a favoring judge because
both were sitting, and Rule 1868 doesn't enforce favoring so strongly
as to restrict the order in which cases are assigned).
As one of the favoring parties
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
-coppro
All of these fail.
Why?
--
-Tiger
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
-coppro
All of these fail.
Why?
Because I
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Having received no objections, I make all the quoted players inactive.
/me is a lonely cow :(
--
-c.
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw 2 * No Confidence for 110zm.
I play No Confidence, specifying the IADoP.
Since it's gone longest without an election, I initiate an election for
Insulator.
2009/9/15 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
(...)
I a Penalty Box and a WRV to ais523.
I don't think this is effective, but fortunately the contract allows
you to complete the win anyway. Congratulations!
--
-Tiger
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
For each public contract that I am a party to, I leave it.
The standards on communicating conditional actions are getting
ridiculous. I'm tempted to post I perform all the actions I CAN,
in the order that maximizes the number of things I can do.
2009/9/15 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
For each public contract that I am a party to, I leave it.
The standards on communicating conditional actions are getting
ridiculous. I'm tempted to post I perform all the actions I CAN,
in the order
It strikes me that Rests aren't much of a punishment atm: you can burn
them off easily enough with Absolv-o-matics, which you are likely to
get for free each month. This also goes against the whole concept of
rests; you are supposed to have to work to burn them off. In fact, it
strikes me that
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Charles Walker wrote:
Get rid of free monthly salaries.
Free monthly salaries were in response to complaints, including from
you IIRC, that the casual non-officer player never got to do much;
e.g. didn't get notes so couldn't increase caste. That's not to say
the salaries
The following mechanic was really useful at setting gameplay balance
rates; e.g. rates of currency distribution, card frequencies, points
per week for contests, etc. The best bit was that it became a
substantial campaign issue for offices but not an unfair one (e.g.
the Poobah benefits are raw
2009/9/15 comex (in IBA report):
-- Cards (Government)
Roll Call 20 15
Debate-o-Matic 20 5
Arm-twist 45 14
On the Nod 45 3
Kill Bill 110 7
Lobbyist 110
Local Election 110
No Confidence 55 5
2009/9/15 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
2009/9/15 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
For each public contract that I am a party to, I leave it.
The standards on communicating conditional actions are getting
ridiculous. I'm tempted
You a Penalty Box? Funny. I accidentally the whole WRV.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2009, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
For each of the following players, I intend, without objection, to make
em inactive (I know it's broken now but I hope the Assessor will pass
the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
Corrected NoV (forget the power of the rule in the first one): ais523
violated the Power-1 rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with the
PerlNomic Partnership contract by attempting to modify it other than by
the
19 matches
Mail list logo
