On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 21:42, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>> For each of the below statements, I perform the indicated action if
>>> and only if I am a player.
>
>>> I intend, without objection, to make Yally inactive.
>>>
>>> --Annabel.
>>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> This NoV is invalid; by rule 2230(c) an NoV must specify one action or
> inaction which is illegal, and that was not clearly present in this NoV
> (there were two alleged actions).
The action was the publication of the report.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> For each of the below statements, I perform the indicated action if
>> and only if I am a player.
>> I intend, without objection, to make Yally inactive.
>>
>> --Annabel.
>
> I object. And why? At the very least, Andon has been registered
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> In other news, I announce the ceremonial shilling of the palace.
Roll 4d6 for structural damage.
coppro wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 08:34 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
6713 0 3.0 Murphy Green Eliminate past repetitive wins
>>> FORx12
>>
>> I have you at 2 rests, giving you a voting limit of 0 here
>> (and 4 -> 6 on the others due to Chief Whip).
>
> Hrm. I have me at 1 Rest (whic
ais523 wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "Rule 101 is greater than rule
> 2029".
>
> Evidence: Excerpt from Rule 2141: "Rules have ID numbers, to be assigned
> by the Rulekeepor, and are strictly ordered."
>
> Arguments: The power-3 rule 2141, by insisting that rules are strictly
>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:07, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 08:52 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>> > Registrar's Census
>>
>> > FIRST-CLASS PLAYERS (19)
>> >
>> > Nickname E-mail address Since Sta
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:40 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Arguments:
>
> This is a classical case of the Paradox of Self-Amendment. The rule says
> that "If any change to the gamestate would cause ... any change in the
> effect or attributes of this rule ... including its repeal ... it is
> cancell
On 04/26/2010 08:34 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
6713 0 3.0 Murphy Green Eliminate past repetitive wins
FORx12
I have you at 2 rests, giving you a voting limit of 0 here
(and 4 -> 6 on the others due to Chief Whip).
Hrm. I have me at 1 Rest (which I gave myself), and I am certainly
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> 6713 0 3.0 Murphy Green Eliminate past repetitive wins
>> 6714 0 2.0 coppro Purple Fix Fix
>> 6715 1 3.0 comex Purple Protect Trophies
>> 6716 1 3.0 coppro Purple Dictatorship Scam
>> 6717 1 3.0
Tiger wrote:
> I change my title to Purple if I can.
You can, your last change was back in December.
coppro wrote:
>> 6713 0 3.0 Murphy Green Eliminate past repetitive wins
> FORx12
I have you at 2 rests, giving you a voting limit of 0 here
(and 4 -> 6 on the others due to Chief Whip).
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 15:39 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Each player who satisfied the Winning Condition of Dictatorship
> > on or before 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 UTC thereby won the game at
> > most once, at the first moment at which e satisfied that
13 matches
Mail list logo
