coppro wrote:
> On 08/28/2010 05:34 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 2851: coppro has admitted to eir guilt. The default penalty is
>> mitigated by the interesting gameplay that has resulted (contrast
>> the hypothetical example of coppro changing eir nickname to "omb",
>> which would just be annoying).
ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 02:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> For each of these cases, I submit the following gratuitous arguments
>> (and apologize for not having included them up front), and intend
>> (with 2 support) to appeal its judgement, recommending REMAND without
>> prejudice:
>
I wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
>> I set the II of this case to 1, deliver the judgement of FALSE with
>> the following arguments, award myself a capacitor, then stand up.
>
> CoE: The standing-up part is ineffective, as the case was no longer
> disinterested by that point.
Also, you were standing anyw
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 02:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> For each of these cases, I submit the following gratuitous arguments
> (and apologize for not having included them up front), and intend
> (with 2 support) to appeal its judgement, recommending REMAND without
> prejudice:
I support.
--
ais523
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 23:31 +0200, Keba wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I set this Case's II to 1.
> > I intend, without 3 objections, to set this Case's II to 2.
> > I intend, without 2 objections, to set this Case's II to 3.
>
> NTTPF.
>
> The latter intend fails, as you may only increase or decr
Warrigal wrote:
> > 6818 G 1 3.0 KebaUrgent Limit
> AGAINST; urgent proposals are already limited by the fact that
> distributing them costs three ergs.
Well, the proposal did not intend to restrict the Urgent Limit of one
player, that's done by ergs and one player can propose many
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I set this Case's II to 1.
> I intend, without 3 objections, to set this Case's II to 2.
> I intend, without 2 objections, to set this Case's II to 3.
NTTPF.
The latter intend fails, as you may only increase or decrease a Case's
II by one.
--
Keba
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 16:13, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I set the II of this case to 1, deliver the judgement of FALSE with
> the following arguments, award myself a capacitor, then stand up.
You can only stand up after judging a disinterested case.
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Unofficial, but fully caught up and accurate AFAIK
Oh thank you for doing my job ;) Well, I intended to report on Sunday
because the PSM could need the information on Monday then (hm, meanwhile
I have to announce changes like "Foo becomes Pilot" so there is no real
reason for re
coppro wrote:
> On 08/28/2010 02:47 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On 08/27/2010 06:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2844
>>>
>>> === CFJ 2844 (Interest Index = 0)
>>>
>>> I have CFJed on this exact statement, excep
On 08/27/2010 02:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
And, from the rulest of 5 years ago today:
Proposal: Church and State (AI=1, II=0)
{{{
Enact a new rule entitled "Church and State" reading
A cardinal is an active, ready player who is neither the current
Speaker nor the Associate Direct
On 08/27/2010 06:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2844
=== CFJ 2844 (Interest Index = 0)
I have CFJed on this exact statement, except with 'United' and
'City' exchanged.
==
On 08/27/2010 02:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 26 August 2010 23:22, Keba wrote:
I submit a Proposal "Journey fix" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
I'd personally prefer a fix that made the first wormhole explicitly a
"Shuttle loses, enemy wins
13 matches
Mail list logo
