On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm the Crown Prince... I pay a fee to move the player immediately
above me on the list of succession down one place on the list of succession.
This fee should be 0.
Not anymore. The fee is now floor[(5+0)/2] = 2. See Proposal 6865.
-G.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:12, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
AGAINST, VETO
[...]
FOR, RUBBERSTAMP
[...]
I transfer a prop from Ienpew III (for not doing much of anything,
really) to Yally (for finally using these powers in an
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I transfer a prop from Ienpew III (for not doing much of anything,
really) to Yally (for finally using these powers in an unabashed
political manner).
I transfer a prop
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
the lesser rules breakage, and not
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable, in terms of the game,
for em to be
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Because I'm the Crown Prince... I pay a fee to move the player immediately
above me on the list of succession down one place on the list of succession.
This fee should be 0.
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I appeal this verdict as it sets a bad precedent: in cases where an
Officer has contradictory duties, it is reasonable for em to choose
the lesser rules breakage, and not reasonable,
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 16:29 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I transfer a prop from ais523 to coppro because it was omd, not coppro
who thought that everyone else was out of prop transfers.
Those two should retroactively avoid formerly having had vaguely similar
names.
--
ais523
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I am initiating an auction for one lot of one Ultraviolet Ribbon. The
currency is Leadership Tokens. The Starting Bid is one Token, which
is presumably also that currency's Minimum Unit Quantity.
This probably fails, because the
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, omd wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I am initiating an auction for one lot of one Ultraviolet Ribbon. The
currency is Leadership Tokens. The Starting Bid is one Token, which
is presumably also that currency's Minimum Unit
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
Pope
AGAINST
Why?
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
Pope
AGAINST
Why?
It allows the IAdoP to change speakership at will.
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6893 O 1 1.0 Flameshadowxeroshin Clarification of the Replacement of the
Pope
AGAINST
Why?
Also note, since movement on the List is
On 12 November 2010 01:45, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Argument:The prop transfer rule (2287) requires that the player performing
the transfer explain why e chose the *player* to transfer it to. Since
Hillary Rodham Clinton is not and has never been a player, the quoted attempt
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6877-6894
To: agora-business agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:45 PM, John Smith spamba...@yahoo.com wrote:
CfJ(inquiry, barred:the author of the message quoted above):Hillary Rodham
Clinton has a prop.
Argument:The prop transfer rule (2287) requires that the player performing
the transfer explain why e chose the *player* to
On 12 November 2010 02:33, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
However, nobody has proven that Hillary Rodham Clinton isn't a player.
In fact I view it as quite likely.
I also believe that Murphy is a small shell script.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin
flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com wrote:
I retract my proposal, #6893.
Sorry, but you can't: it's not in the Proposal Pool anymore.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:13, Flameshadowxeroshin
flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal, 'Clarification of the Replacement of
the Pope', and make it distributable by fee:
In rule 2316:
[The current rule does not provide any clear way to replace the pope,
19 matches
Mail list logo
