On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:18 -0800, John Smith wrote:
In the interest of maintaining everyone's right to resolve matters of
controversy,
If and only if no player is currently Grand Vizier,
{I register myself as a player.
I flip my posture to Sitting.
I intend, with notice, to act as
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, omd wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This distribution of proposal 6958
initiates the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt it. The eligible
voters are the active players at the time of this distribution
In case
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, ais523 wrote:
And I was indeed wondering if the attempted mass deregistration violated
R101 (how can you resolve a matter of controversy in a remotely fair
manner when there's a dictatorship?).
Three comments:
1. R101 guarantees an expectation of resolution, but says
If you were inactive, how could you be an eligible voter?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, John Smith wrote:
In the interest of maintaining everyone's right to resolve matters of
controversy,
If and only if
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, com...@gmail.com wrote:
If you were inactive, how could you be an eligible voter?
I became active last Tuesday (before the scam) but the Losing Condition
of inactivity persists for a week after becoming active (R2130 last
sentence) so just ended for me a few hours ago.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, com...@gmail.com wrote:
If you were inactive, how could you be an eligible voter?
I became active last Tuesday (before the scam) but the Losing Condition
of inactivity persists for a week after becoming active (R2130 last
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
2. At least one absolute ruler is a *byword* for fair resolution (Solomon).
The proof of the pudding...
Or maybe it's exceptio probat regulam. Fallacies are fun.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
2. At least one absolute ruler is a *byword* for fair resolution (Solomon).
The proof of the pudding...
Or maybe it's exceptio probat regulam. Fallacies are fun.
Less
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
2. At least one absolute ruler is a *byword* for fair resolution (Solomon).
The proof of the pudding...
Or maybe it's exceptio probat regulam. Fallacies are fun.
And
9 matches
Mail list logo
