On 06/15/2011 11:31 PM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I think the timing of truth values and disclaimers is in fact "more
>> complex and less clear." For example, if disclaimers work immediately
>> forward, it would imply they could work immediately backwards
> Voting results for Proposals 7059 - 7073 (and maybe 7046):
Informal CoEs, accepted:
* Wooble also voted PRESENT on 7059-73
* Number of voters on 7059-60 did not include ehird (who voted
conditionally)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think the timing of truth values and disclaimers is in fact "more
> complex and less clear." For example, if disclaimers work immediately
> forward, it would imply they could work immediately backwards, with
> connotations that a "message" n
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 05:53 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> > This is not at all obvious to me. Backwards-disclaimers *might* work if
> > the disclaimer was in the same atomic message as the disclaimed text,
> > but in the case of any kind of confusion, I would strongly lean to
On 06/15/2011 05:53 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> This is not at all obvious to me. Backwards-disclaimers *might* work if
> the disclaimer was in the same atomic message as the disclaimed text,
> but in the case of any kind of confusion, I would strongly lean towards
> evaluating in chronological order, wit
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> CFJs 1451-1452 establish that messages generally can be split into
> multiple emails.
Gratuitious: yes, but in those cases, the messages were reasonably
clearly marked as forming a single message. In this case, the messages
are reasonably clearly
On 06/15/2011 04:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> if disclaimers work immediately
> forward, it would imply they could work immediately backwards
(I suggest using 'atomic message' to mean the ordinary sense of an email
message, and 'compound message' to mean the legal fiction of a message
reconstructed
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin
> > wrote:
> >> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
> >>
> >> Hmm.
> >>
> >> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
> >>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> H. Murphy, would it be possible to somehow annotate CFJ 1776 in the
> database so that doing a statement text search for "rotating the
> bench" would make it show up?
I don't know if anyone reads those things, but I just updated the FLR
annot
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> > Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
> >
> > It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
>
On 06/15/2011 12:13 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
>>
>> Hmm.
>>
>> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
>>
>> It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
>
> CF
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I intend to deputize to Rotate the Bench.
>
> Hmm.
>
> Proto-CFJ for discussion (not CFJ for obvious reasons - need a justiciar!):
>
> It is possible to deputize to Rotate The Bench.
CFJ 1776 states (using dated terminology) that it is possib
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> I haven't gotten any Agora mails since Friday, and a cursory glance at
> the web archives seems to confirm the lack of messages. Is it just slow,
> or is there something wrong with the lists?
Heh. Just tried to poke it myself as you were writing this... wai
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:46 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> I haven't gotten any Agora mails since Friday, and a cursory glance at
> the web archives seems to confirm the lack of messages. Is it just slow,
> or is there something wrong with the lists?
It's just slow. (Good thing we don't have BlogNomic's
I haven't gotten any Agora mails since Friday, and a cursory glance at
the web archives seems to confirm the lack of messages. Is it just slow,
or is there something wrong with the lists?
15 matches
Mail list logo
