scshunt wrote:
> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
>>> ENDORSE AGORA
>>
>> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
>> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm
>> interpreting this as ineffe
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Amend Rule 1607 (Distribution) by replacing the paragraph beginning
> "The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal which..." with:
>
> Priority is an undistributed proposal switch with values of the
> integers (default zero), tracked by
On 8 July 2011 01:29, Pavitra wrote:
> E suggested that eir S key was broken, but later falsified this.
Could just be hard to press. Could have got a new keyboard.
On 07/07/2011 07:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
>>> ENDORSE AGORA
>>
>> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
>> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm
>> in
On 07/07/2011 03:52 PM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 07:02, Pavitra wrote:
>> Wait, what?
> What?
E suggested that eir S key was broken, but later falsified this.
On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
ENDORSE AGORA
Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm
interpreting this as ineffective due to lack of clarity.
A
>> 7098 1.7 omd     Victory case changes
> JE NE SAIS PAS
This is French for "I do not know". I'm interpreting it as ineffective.
>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
> ENDORSE AGORA
Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
for something like "i
On 7 July 2011 23:50, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> It was pointed out to me that Rule 0 says that events with absolute
> deadlines don't occur at all, and "the third midnight UTC" is an
> absolute deadline.
Is it? It's relative to the start of the emergency.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 06:16, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> WHEREAS B Nomic was in fact recently discovered to have been
>> locked in perpetual Emergency since 2002, such that its game can
>> never advance; and
>
> Have you got any pointers? Thre
On 7 July 2011 07:02, Pavitra wrote:
> Wait, what?
What?
On 7 July 2011 06:16, Sean Hunt wrote:
> WHEREAS B Nomic was in fact recently discovered to have been
> locked in perpetual Emergency since 2002, such that its game can
> never advance; and
Have you got any pointers? Thread titles, etc.; I must have missed this.
Is there truly no
On 11-07-07 07:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
WHEREAS B Nomic, a well-played Nomic, did claim to pass a
proposal directing a player to end the game,
Your definition of "well-played" may be off a bit; that was a
particularly bad piece
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 10:21 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > WHEREAS B Nomic, a well-played Nomic, did claim to pass a
> > proposal directing a player to end the game,
>
> Your definition of "well-played" may be off a bit; that was a
>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> WHEREAS B Nomic, a well-played Nomic, did claim to pass a
> proposal directing a player to end the game,
Your definition of "well-played" may be off a bit; that was a
particularly bad piece of gameplay.
Although, to be fair, no one act
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Award B Nomic the Patent Title "Imaginationland"
>
> Official pedantry: Not a person.
Proto: first create a rule making B Nomic a third-class person.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 11-07-06 10:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > Award B Nomic the Patent Title "Imaginationland"
> >
> > Official pedantry: Not a person.
>
> Irrelevant, but relevant is power. I retract the proposal "B is Dead! Lon
16 matches
Mail list logo
