On 08/15/2011 06:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein
>> wrote:
>>> I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
>>> permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:08, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
> > I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
> > permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to
> > catch him on some other issue that th
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:00, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I agree with scshunt's arguments. Destroying the points all at once is
> permitted by the rules, even if it is a mistake in the rules. Trying to
> catch him on some other issue that the courts already DISMISSED in order to
> make-up for him cl
On 08/15/2011 08:28 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3089
>>
>> == CFJ 3089 ==
>>
>>I am Arkady English
>>
>> ==
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 08:19 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think it would be *very* interesting someone else on BlogNomic and here
> claimed to act for Agora "as speaker" (or whatever other office e might
> be) and see what BlogNomic does with competing claims.
Well, they didn't do anything with th
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> No, I'm still the ambassador intending to play the game on behalf of
> Agora. Due to this discussion I'm fairly certain I dan't take any
> actions that would, by the rules of Agora, count as being on behalf
> of, so I won't take actions until this re
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3086
> >
> > == CFJ 3086 ==
> >
> > Agora's right to participate in the fora is substanti
On 08/15/2011 04:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Violating an active Ambassadorial Mission, or acting on behalf of
> Agora in foreign nomics not covered by any Mission, is the
> Class-6 crime of Ambassadoring at Large.
I think that inaction despite being directed to act should be a
On 08/15/2011 08:28 AM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3089
>>
>> == CFJ 3089 ==
>>
>>I am Arkady English
>>
>> ==
On 15 August 2011 12:25, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 03:22, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>>
>> Right, maybe the SHOULD quoted ought to be a SHALL?
>>
>> - Tiger
>>
>
> Yeah, that makes sense. Originally I thought it didn't for some reason, but
> it makes sense that it should.
>
> Unrel
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 03:22, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Right, maybe the SHOULD quoted ought to be a SHALL?
>
> - Tiger
>
>
Yeah, that makes sense. Originally I thought it didn't for some reason, but
it makes sense that it should.
Unrelated: do you want your name changed back in BlogNomic?
-scsh
On 15 August 2011 11:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:02, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> b) The goals the Ambassador SHOULD strive to fulfill when acting
>> on Agora's behalf in that nomic
>>
>> c)The limits on what actions the Ambassador MAY take when
>> acting on A
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:02, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> BEGIN PROPOSAL
>
> Long-term ambassador powers
> (AI = 1)
>
> Amend Rule 2352, replacing the following part:
>
> When the office of Ambassador first becomes filled, the holder
> SHALL as soon as possible attempt to cause Agora to beco
13 matches
Mail list logo
