Re: DIS: On dummy player records in the CotC DB

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: >> "mister snuggles" is used for actions purported to relate to em, whoever >> e is. >> >> "Unknown" is used for an unnamed justice in CFJ 1212a; Steve's archives >> indicated that e was replaced, but did n

Re: DIS: On dummy player records in the CotC DB

G. wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: "mister snuggles" is used for actions purported to relate to em, whoever e is. "Unknown" is used for an unnamed justice in CFJ 1212a; Steve's archives indicated that e was replaced, but did not identify em. "Anonymous" is used for the caller of

Re: DIS: On dummy player records in the CotC DB

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > "mister snuggles" is used for actions purported to relate to em, whoever > e is. > > "Unknown" is used for an unnamed justice in CFJ 1212a; Steve's archives > indicated that e was replaced, but did not identify em. "Anonymous" is > used for the caller of

DIS: On dummy player records in the CotC DB

In case anyone's curious: "mister snuggles" is used for actions purported to relate to em, whoever e is. "Unknown" is used for an unnamed justice in CFJ 1212a; Steve's archives indicated that e was replaced, but did not identify em. "Anonymous" is used for the caller of CFJ 2180, who self-ident

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win-limiting proposals

On 13 December 2011 16:38, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn >>> wrote: Are you... trolling? >>> >>> Well, are you humaning? >>> >>> adiosTo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This doesn't do anything useful, but it's sure nifty that it's possible

Arkady English wrote: Add a rule titled "Rule Ownership" with the text: "All rules, unless explicitly stated, are owned by The President." I explicitly state that all rules are owned by me. Better yet, I create a rule stating "All rules are owned by Murphy". > "- Rules in conflict which are

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win-limiting proposals

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn >> wrote: >>> Are you... trolling? >> >> Well, are you humaning? >> >> adiosToreador > > Touché. Which universe is this again? What makes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: This doesn't do anything useful, but it's sure nifty that it's possible

> Add a rule titled "Rule Ownership" with the text: > "All rules, unless explicitly stated, are owned by The President." Perhaps something like "Rules are fixed assets whose recordkeepor is . Every rule is, by default, owned by the President." > Alter the text of rule 1030 to add this paragra

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win-limiting proposals

On 13 December 2011 14:51, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> On 12 December 2011 22:42, Tanner Swett wrote: >>> >>> (…) >>> >>> —Tavros *cough* Nitram >> >> Are you... trolling? > > Well, are you humaning? > > adiosToreador Touché. Which universe

DIS: Re: BUS: This doesn't do anything useful, but it's sure nifty that it's possible

On 12 December 2011 07:46, Alex Smith wrote: > I intend, without objection, to transfer rule 2166 from the Lost and > Found department to myself. > > (This works because rules fulfil the definition of assets; they exist > only because they're rules-defined (their backing document is rule 2141, >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Win-limiting proposals

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > On 12 December 2011 22:42, Tanner Swett wrote: >> >> (…) >> >> —Tavros *cough* Nitram > > Are you... trolling? Well, are you humaning? adiosToreador