Thanks, I meant the latter. I'll repropose (, distribute, etc.) tomorrow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:12 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Casting a vote for PRESENT is equivalent to endorsing the
You will nod you, indeed!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I transfer a ruble to Nuas Te.
-scshunt
Would, even.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2012, at 11:36 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
You will nod you, indeed!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I transfer a ruble to Nuas Te.
-scshunt
I think this would just result in fewer PRESENT votes and more no-votes.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:24 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I belatedly judge CFJs 3215-16 TRUE, because as I mentioned shortly
after they were called, there are more unusual ways to introduce
proposal or cause rule changes that would prevent Agora from being
ossified in any case.
Did you
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
*scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
ASAP after it was assigned to em.
Evidence:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I transfer a ruble to Nuas Te.
Thank you.
—Nuas te
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 18:42 +0100, FKA441344 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA44131...@gmail.com wrote:
*scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
ASAP
3218 is an inquiry case; NOT GUILTY is not a valid judgement for it.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I judge CFJs 3217 and 3218 NOT GUILTY. I can't find anything in rule
2365, nor in rule 2362, nor in rule 2354 (which uses condition), that
would imply that
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
My opinion is FALSE. Since my nickname change was not posted to a
public forum, nor even a forum that most Agorans subscribe to, it was
not known to Agora at large, making the name Nuas Te ambiguous.
(Subjectively
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:20 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Granted on whether the case existed, but I don't follow how it would
have existed and been assigned to someone else (especially FKA441344,
who initiated it).
You purported to assign it to FKA441344, so it rather depends on
11 matches
Mail list logo
