On 21 Jun 2013, at 22:11, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: Track Constitutions (AI=2, PF=0, disi.)
{{{
Amend the rule Parties by replacing eir report includes a list of
all parties. with eir report includes a list of all parties and eir
constitutions.
}}}
This is
This also introduces rule number stability by removing the last sentence of
R109.
I submit the following proposals:
- Make Rule 106 mutable
- Make Rule 107 mutable
- Make Rule 109 mutable
- Amend Rule 106 to read A proposal is an ordered list of proposed rule
changes. All proposals made in the
Voting on 310 closes in about an hour. Report at that time.
Voting on 311-314 closes in about 14 hours.
Here I just number and repeat the nine new proposals that were made.
Voting on these closes in 24 hours.
315 (Walker):
- Make Rule 106 mutable
316 (Walker):
- Make Rule 107 mutable
I propose that rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
Chuck
Good day Agorans,
Since last report, proposal 308 failed and 309 was adopted. Voting on
310 just closed, and it was adopted. 309 amends rule 206 to allow vote
buying, and 310 transmutes 114 to mutable. The current ruleset is
included at the end of this message.
Proposal 308 (Chuck) failed
I invoke Judgement on the following statement:
The proposals numbered 312, 313, 318, 319, and 320 are not proposed rule
changes, and will have no effect if adopted, regardless of the adoption of
other currently existing proposals.
Reasoning: they propose to amend (currently) immutable
I propose that all rules be transmuted to mutable.
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores, the
Speaker wins the game.
Chuck
I invoke judgement on whether or not Goethe's transfers succeeded.
Judgement: FALSE (did not succeed)
On 21/06/2013 11:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
My arguments:
For the first group of transfers:
Transfer is not the same as give. It implies conveyance, but
there are three parties involved:
On 22/06/2013 9:45 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
I propose that all rules be transmuted to mutable.
One transmutation per proposal at the moment.
-Dan
Here I number and repeat two new proposals:
324 (Chuck):
I propose that rule 110 be transmuted to mutable.
325 (Chuck):
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores,
the Speaker wins the game.
Voting closes in 24 hours.
-Dan
On 22/06/2013 9:09 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I invoke Judgement on the following statement:
The “proposals” numbered 312, 313, 318, 319, and 320 are not proposed
rule changes, and will have no effect if adopted, regardless of the
adoption of other currently existing proposals.
Reasoning: they
I call for judgement on the validity of proposal 322. See rule 105. 322
contains a conditional:
322 (Walker):
- If the Rule initially numbered 106 is mutable, amend Rule 210 to
read ...
This isn't like the rule formerly numbered 211 which isn't a condition
but a way to refer to a rule.
By
On 22/06/2013 10:01 AM, Chuck Carroll wrote:
I propose the following rule be created:
If at any time four or more Voters have identical non-zero scores, the
Speaker wins the game.
Chuck
This has an interesting interaction with 306... you (among others) could
make me win by announcement.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
- Amend Rule 106 to read A proposal is an ordered list of proposed rule
changes. All proposals made in the proper way shall be voted on. They will
be adopted if and only if they receive the required number of
I realize that I shouldn't have joined a *turbo* game when I'm not
even sure I'm able to follow the pace of a *regular* game.
To fix that, I vote FOR on every proposal I can. Yay. =P
~ Roujo
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at
On Saturday, June 22, 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
I recuse Wes from CFJ 3329, and assign that CFJ to Walker.
I make Wes supine, since e doesn't seem be active enough to take care
of eir assignements.
I recuse Wes from CFJ 3318, rotate the bench and assign that CFJ to G.
I recuse Wes from
But I did send it to agora-offical. Do you mean one message per action?
~ Roujo
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:19 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 22, 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
I recuse Wes from CFJ 3329, and assign that CFJ to Walker.
I make Wes supine, since e doesn't
Re post it in formal form with all the evidence case record etc. including
Assingments in subject lines?
(Tho it's cool, I saw mine)
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
But I did send it to agora-offical. Do you mean one message per action?
~ Roujo
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at
19 matches
Mail list logo
