My dim recollection is that it took a kind of high level scam (in the sense
of loophole exploitation, there was no attempt to win) to move away from
the Mutable/Immutable distinction. But we didn't get straight to the Power
system - that came later. The intermediate stage involved the definition of
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> The "Judgement" column on this page isn't working, or indeed on any
> other page which is a list of cases.
>
> http://cotc.psychose.ca/list.php
>
> -- Walker
Duly noted, although working through the backlog has priority over
fixing the site
Roujo,
Would you mind putting programs.tar.gz and dump.txt.gz back on your
copy of the CotC database?
Thanks.
On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Please provide the text of the agreement so that it
>>> can be determined that you have willfully consented.
>>> Note: providing the text of the UNDEAD a
I find all the instances of "spend N Yaks, where N is the value of the
Something Switch, a Budget Switch" and suchlike in the Rules to be
ugly. The Tax Rule is the worst (best?) example of this. Of course,
it's all my fault, because I mostly wrote the Rules in question, so
I'd like to rectify the s
I support and do so!
On Jul 2, 2013 2:19 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 14:12 -0400, omd wrote:
> > I intend, with two Independent support, to create a party with the
> > following constitution:
> >
> > 1. This party shall be known as the Best Party.
> > 2. Any player may flip th
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Machiavelli wrote:
> >
> >> I join UNDEAD.
> >
> > CoE: Over my dead body you do!
>
> Denied.
>
> On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> >> I join
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
> Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
> requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
> fails to award me those particular Yaks? What
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> I join UNDEAD.
Please provide the text of the agreement so that it
can be determined that you have willfully consented.
Note: providing the text of the UNDEAD agreement may
or may not be punishable.
On 2 July 2013 17:51, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Well, here's a question for you (pertains to the Infractions proto too).
> Should we try for a multi-currency system of some kind (with multiple
> bank currencies of different liquidity) or stick with Yaks for everything
> for the time being. (Not sure t
Yes.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
> Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
> requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
> fails to award me those par
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 23:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> >> On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> > Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
> >>
> >> G., do you still intend to propose this?
> >
> > I ha
If an officer is required to perform a specific action (e.g. award N
Yaks to Walker) and the office changes hands, does that specific
requirement go along with it? Or is the new officer NOT GUILTY if e
fails to award me those particular Yaks? What if the office changes
hands one day before the end
On 1 July 2013 23:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 29 April 2013 17:53, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > Proto: basic Infractions mechanism (Discuss!)
>>
>> G., do you still intend to propose this?
>
> I haven't taken it any further, feel free to jump into the lead
On Jul 1, 2013, at 7:01 PM, omd wrote:
> Note to self: This was never distributed. As I said, by next week, I
> will have a script to avoid these way-too-frequent missed proposals.
> Or you can replace me.
I initiate an election for Promotor, nominating myself.
—Machiavelli, who's still pretty b
On 2 July 2013 14:07, Max Schutz wrote:
> since the census says i am inactive ibecome active again and do i just vote
> here or is there a bizzare procedure to voting
There's no particularly bizzare procedure: you just write "I vote for
X", or whatever. But both becoming active and voting have to
since the census says i am inactive ibecome active again and do i just vote
here or is there a bizzare procedure to voting
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Walker wrote:
>
> > On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> scshunt wrote:
>>>
I hereby initiate the Agoran Dec
Walker wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy wrote:
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
active players, and the vote co
On 2 July 2013 13:28, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> scshunt wrote:
>>> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
>>> candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
>>>
>>> The valid options are the candidates, the eligible v
On 2 July 2013 13:10, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
>> I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
>> candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
>>
>> The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
>> active players, and the vote collec
G. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Fool wrote:
On 26/06/2013 12:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I was blocking on the term "logician", that's a better choice. (Just had a
flashback to the day in grad school when I became a committed Bayesian,
maybe I was channeling).
Yeah man, you can get flashbacks
scshunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to select the Herald. The
candidates are scshunt and G., each with Proposed Salary 100.
The valid options are the candidates, the eligible voters are the
active players, and the vote collector is the IADoP. Voting is open
for one week.
Thou
After less than two weeks of playing Nomic, when I was thinking this morning
that I needed to look up some details about a product, my internal monologue
told me that I needed to "check the Ruleset" for that.
Chuck
On 2 July 2013 03:30, Sgeo wrote:
> I feel uncomfortable with the notion that the punishment for a crime is
> dictated by a seemingly unrelated rule, and if that rule changes, the
> punishment could end up changing underneath people's feet.
Don't think of changing the registration delay as changi
24 matches
Mail list logo
