[ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are "hard". Some of
the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
Ribbons. I've tried to cover the full range of ways of participating
in Agora, but the requirement of "no easy awards" means there's
nothing to do with judging a c
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> [ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are "hard". Some of
> the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
> Ribbons. I've tried to cover the full range of ways of participating
> in Agora, but the requirement
On 3 July 2013 16:09, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> [ A replacement Ribbons system in which all awards are "hard". Some of
>> the easier Photons are the same difficulty as some of the harder
>> Ribbons. I've tried to cover the full range of ways of
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Er, not sure what you're on about. I'm aware of the fix proposal and
> the proposal to repeal Ribbons. I was protoing this in the expectation
> that the latter will pass.
>
> -- Walker
I mean the 2010-ish version.
-scshunt
On 3 July 2013 16:31, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Er, not sure what you're on about. I'm aware of the fix proposal and
>> the proposal to repeal Ribbons. I was protoing this in the expectation
>> that the latter will pass.
>>
>
> I mean the 2010-
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> I just looked at a couple of 2010 SLRs. Looks similar to the current
> Ribbons. What about it?
>
> -- Walker
>
Among other things, a thesis was required.
-scshunt
On 3 July 2013 16:39, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I just looked at a couple of 2010 SLRs. Looks similar to the current
>> Ribbons. What about it?
>>
>> -- Walker
>>
>
> Among other things, a thesis was required.
>
> -scshunt
Ah, right. Is that a
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
My dim recollection is that it took a kind of high level scam (in the sense
of loophole exploitation, there was no attempt to win) to move away from the
Mutable/Immutable distinction. But we didn't get straight to the Power
system - that came later. The
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> The Herald is the recordkeeper of Photons.
I think this goes too far the other direction. Looking for a middle
ground. Here's the suggestions I posted a couple weeks ago:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Had a pass on possible Ribbon alter
Are objects of this type (Ribbons, and Yaks for that matter) considered
inherently transferable, or does a rule need to exist to make them so?
Matthew Berlin
arkes...@gmail.com
535 Misty Patch Rd.
Coatesville, PA 19320
(484) 832-1055
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matt Berlin wrote:
> Are objects of this type (Ribbons, and Yaks for that matter) considered
> inherently transferable, or does a rule need to exist to make them so?
Assets are transferable unless defined as fixed.
-scshunt
By default they are transferable (liquid). But if the rules define them as
"fixed", they are not transferable. Ribbons are fixed (R2387 first sentence),
Yaks are liquid since nothing calls them fixed.
This is defined in the second-to-last paragraph in Rule 2166 (Assets).
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > 3343: FALSE
> >
> > If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
> > its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
> > constitution currently does so.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, omd wrote:
> Second, does authorizing scshunt to perform a complicated action that
> includes awarding a Patent Title count as authorizing em to award a
> Patent Title? In that case, there would be no Power issue.
Arguments: Even if it does, the award is pragmatic
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:35 PM, omd wrote:
> > Second, does authorizing scshunt to perform a complicated action that
> > includes awarding a Patent Title count as authorizing em to award a
> > Patent Title? In that case, there would be no Power issue.
>
>
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I create the following promise and transfer it to G.:
>* Text: I act as specified by the casher in the same message
>as the cashing.
>* Title: Murphy 20130703 Trust Fund
>* Condition to cash: The cas
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 19:56 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> I guess the answer is to make it generic enough that although people
> know of it's existence, it's unclear what it will be used for.
Wow, I haven't made that particular typo in /years/.
--
ais523
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
What exactly do you mean by a "submarine contract"? Just a private
one? Or something else. -G.
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
>
> What exactly do you mean by a "submarine contract"? Just a private
> one? Or something else. -G.
Basically an agreement to
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:03 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > I was wondering how you created a submarine contract using promises.
> >
> > What exactly do you mean by a "submarine contract"? Just a private
> > one?
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Ah, when you said 'contract', I thought you meant something enforceable,
> which the promise can't do (but private contracts could). That is, if
> Murphy and I made a private agreement resulting in this PoA, but I abuse
> the PoA outside o
You could probably use encryption to get all of it.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Ah, when you said 'contract', I thought you meant something enforceable,
> > which the promise can't do (but private contracts could). That is, if
> > Murphy and I made a private agreement resulti
On 3 July 2013 18:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
>> The Herald is the recordkeeper of Photons.
>
> I think this goes too far the other direction. Looking for a middle
> ground. Here's the suggestions I posted a couple weeks ago:
Well, as I said, it's delibera
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Would the following meet the "reasonably available" test:
>
>Conditions for Cashing: the message is within the bounds of messages
>allowed by the private NONDEAD agreement. This is assumed to be
>true unless the author publicly C
On 3 July 2013 22:11, Alex Smith wrote:
> I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise "I perform
> the specified action with the sha-1 hash ". For
> bonus points, you could even transfer it to the Tree, leaving it unclear
> who you'd made the promise to.
I think encryption where y
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 22:25 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 3 July 2013 22:11, Alex Smith wrote:
> > I think ehird's suggestion works, though; you could promise "I perform
> > the specified action with the sha-1 hash ". For
> > bonus points, you could even transfer it to the Tree, leaving it uncle
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Arguments: Even if it does, the award is pragmatic, and since the
> Herald did not award Renascent to me before I awarded myself a
> Transparent Ribbon, the award still succeeds.
It's not the Herald that would be authorized to award Renascent, it
Agora is older than Eternal September...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
3343: FALSE
If any party's constitution actually authorized party members to act on
its behalf, then such an inference would be valid. However, no party's
constitution currently does so.
I intend to app
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Elliott Hird wrote:
I intend, with 3 elder support, to declare a gerontocracy.
Is the joke that I've been a Player before y'all and still am not an
Elder? (Or even registered.)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Good spot. I initiate an election for Ambassador at Large and nominate myself.
>
> Manifesto:
>
> - I'll actively search for foreign nomics and attempt to recognise
> them, while maintaining strict criteria for which nomics deserve
> recognit
AGAINST until the party bug is fixed.
-scshunt
On Jul 3, 2013 9:33 PM, "Charles Walker" wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
> distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
> support actions for the next month might get annoying. (It would
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
> distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
> support actions for the next month might get annoying. (It would not
> violate R1607 to distribute this we
On 4 July 2013 02:06, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Is the joke that I've been a Player before y'all and still am not an Elder?
> (Or even registered.)
The joke is that I needed a subject line and am tired. But you should
totally register!
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
>> distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
>> support actions for the next month might get annoy
On 4 July 2013 02:40, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:33 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal and request that the H. Promotor
>>> distribute it as soon as possible, because waiting four days for
>>> supp
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:40 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > You're requesting speedy distribution without paying the fee for speedy
> > distribution?
>
> There's a fee?
I thought the idea behind proposal fees was that the proposals with the
largest
> There's no fee for disinterested proposals; I'm not sure what happened
> to the proposal to distribute interested proposals for free (MI
> permitting).
>
> -- Walker
>
Passed, I believe.
On 4 July 2013 02:46, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:40 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> > You're requesting speedy distribution without paying the fee for speedy
>> > distribution?
>>
>> There's a fee?
>
> I thought the idea behind pro
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:39 PM, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with two Independent Support, to form the Inflationary Party with
> the following Constitution:
Heh... I had the same idea, but I was going to wait until the wins for
Yaks proposal passed.
Got to wait 4 days...
On Jul 3, 2013 9:56 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 02:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> > On 3 July 2013 19:21, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Ed Murphy
> wrote:
> > >> 3343: FALSE
> > >>
> > >> If any party's constitution actually
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing "Party members SHALL obey their
> party's constitution." with "Party members SHALL obey their party's
> constitution, except where this would cause them to violate a Rule in
> the absence of this clause.
On 4 July 2013 03:01, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing "Party members SHALL obey their
>> party's constitution." with "Party members SHALL obey their party's
>> constitution, except where this would cause them to violat
On 03/07/2013 10:07 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
On 4 July 2013 03:01, omd wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
Amend Rule 2410 (Parties) by replacing "Party members SHALL obey their
party's constitution." with "Party members SHALL obey their party's
constitution, except
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I act.
FYI, as Registrar, I am not treating this as making you active.
46 matches
Mail list logo
