On Wed, 13 May 2015, omd wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:27 PM, omd wrote:
> > ...oh, and that reminds me that the SLR ratification in one of your
> > proposals will remove the power-1 dictatorship rule I still might have
> > (!)
>
> Oh crap, never mind, it was repealed already two weeks ag
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE for a player to win by Raising a Banner and, if a
> player wins the game, a new game begins.}
>
> Arguments: I believe R101 now takes precedence over 1023.
Arguments: If this is FALSE, I think the same logic implies Michae
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:27 PM, omd wrote:
> ...oh, and that reminds me that the SLR ratification in one of your
> proposals will remove the power-1 dictatorship rule I still might have
> (!)
Oh crap, never mind, it was repealed already two weeks ago by Proposal
7737, apparently without anyone
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Domains (AI=3)
> {{{
> Enact a new power-3 Rule (Domains):
> entities, and any other things
Oh boy, nomics have really beaten that word to death over the years,
haven't they... Nevertheless, I think "entities" is sufficient.
>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Enact a new power-3 Rule (Domains):
>> A Domain is a class of concepts, game state, entities, and any
>> other things. There is no restriction as to what can be in a
>> Domain, and one
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> The Power of an entity in a Domain cannot be set or modified
> except as stipulated by the Rules. All entities have Power zero
> in each Domain except where specifically allowed by the rules.
Further comment: Is it your intent that the
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Enact a new power-3 Rule (Domains):
> A Domain is a class of concepts, game state, entities, and any
> other things. There is no restriction as to what can be in a
> Domain, and one thing can be in multiple Domains. Domains and
> the
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 17:31 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> 3. A Rule with an ID number takes precedence over a Rule with a
>> lesser ID number.
>
> Why are you reversing the ID number precedence rule? (In particular,
> what interactio
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 17:31 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> 3. A Rule with an ID number takes precedence over a Rule with a
> lesser ID number.
Why are you reversing the ID number precedence rule? (In particular,
what interaction are you expecting to change?) Rules with lower numbers
tend
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 12:45 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > Gray (Y): The Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement, unless e
> > > has done so earlier in the month. E is ENCOURAGED to award such a Ribbon
>
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 12:45 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Gray (Y): The Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement, unless e
> > has done so earlier in the month. E is ENCOURAGED to award such a Ribbon
> > in the same message in which e publishes eir mon
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> Gray (Y): The Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement, unless e
> has done so earlier in the month. E is ENCOURAGED to award such a Ribbon
> in the same message in which e publishes eir monthly report.
Ok, I don't agree with making ribbons easier
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> Okay, I've got a new idea... what if each of the offices had a
> significant power associated with them? Running off of G.'s use of discretion
> as
> CotC, what if, instead of ele
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> Okay, I've got a new idea... what if each of the offices had a
> significant power associated with them? Running off of G.'s use of discretion
> as
> CotC, what if, instead of ele
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sean Hunt
wrote:
> Okay, I've got a new idea... what if each of the offices had a significant
> power associated with them? Running off of G.'s use of discretion as CotC,
> what if, instead of elections, the Prime Minister appointed people to
> offices, under cert
Okay, I've got a new idea... what if each of the offices had a significant
power associated with them? Running off of G.'s use of discretion as CotC,
what if, instead of elections, the Prime Minister appointed people to
offices, under certain parameters? Try to make each of the offices
sufficiently
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ {It is POSSIBLE for a player to win by Raising a Banner and, if a
> player wins the game, a new game begins.}
> Arguments: I believe R101 now takes precedence over 1023.
grr, now *I* have to choose between favoring this one versus the
"areana wins"
17 matches
Mail list logo
