Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > This rule last > appeared in the FLR here [1] and was repealed by proposal 7629, > distributed here [2]. I'd give you the date it was assessed, but I > can't find the assessment, even after much searching. I could be in > error, or it could be that the

DIS: Re: BUS: Elections

You aren't the ADOP, so you would need instead 4 support, but I'll get to those elections shortly - don't worry On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 23:09 V.J Rada wrote: > Because I am rather bored, I initiate elections for Prime Minister, Herald > and Report or by announcement.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote: >> >> >> I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860, 7861, 7862, >> and 7863 as below. >> >> >> >> [

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Resolving elections for Secretary, Superintendent, and Tailor

I am also honoured to be serving in another office, for which I will publish the first report on Thursday, if I have internet. However, I must warn that I may end up off grid making it delayed until Saturday. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 26,

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Resolving elections for Secretary, Superintendent, and Tailor

> On Jun 26, 2017, at 8:57 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I resolve the Agoran Decisions for Secretary, Superintendent, and Tailor: > > Secretary: o is the winner, and remains holder of the office. I am honoured to serve. > Superintendent: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus is the winner, and becomes >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864

Could you clarify this message? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 26, 2017, at 8:48 PM, Quazie wrote: > > I am sorry for formating I properly. I'll confronted to the ruleset next > time. > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:41 Gaelan Steele wrote:

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

I meant in the technical sense - should I make a claim of error, and if so, what is the nature of the error? I can’t see any reason simple duplication wouldn’t be formally acceptable, even if it is messy, but the ratification parts of the rules aren’t my forté. -o > On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:33 P

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolving proposals 7859-7864

I am sorry for formating I properly. I'll confronted to the ruleset next time. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:41 Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Quazie wrote: > > > > > > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7864, 7859, 7860, 7861, > 7862, and 7863 as below. > > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Gah - i'll republish the single correct body shortly On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 20:31 Owen Jacobson wrote: > Is the duplicated report body an error? > > -o > > On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote: > > See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ for past, current, and future > reports. > > <---

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Metareport

Is the duplicated report body an error? -o > On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Quazie wrote: > > See https://agoranomic.github.io/ADoP/ > for past, current, and future > reports. > > <--> > >

Re: Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

>No, it only allows me to limit eir game actions because it only allows internal actions, if you look at the rules. ...I don't see that. Maybe I'm missing something though - in which case, please point out what I'm missing. What I'm finding is: "However, the Herald may remove participants or l

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

No, it only allows me to limit eir game actions because it only allows internal actions, if you look at the rules. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > "limit eir actions" > > While I endorse that PSS can do well as a sole Judge for the Tourn

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

"limit eir actions" While I endorse that PSS can do well as a sole Judge for the Tourney, t-that provision is way too much power for a mere mortal imo. Limiting the ability to propose! To comment! To vote! To register! To *do* *anything*. Too much! But the rest looks solid and better, altho

Re: DIS: on privacy

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > > We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules. > > Yes, I agree, it's simple to add an asterisk to the tourney regulations > with a statement: "a message is private if and only if ...(whatever)

RE: DIS: on privacy

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote: > We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules. Yes, I agree, it's simple to add an asterisk to the tourney regulations with a statement: "a message is private if and only if ...(whatever)". Doesn't matter if it's arbitrary ("a message to everyone's re

RE: DIS: on privacy

We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules. I also find the private/public dichotomy to be weak. I can, instead of posting to the public fora, just get everyone's emails and send them an email straight to them individually but with the same message. It's private! Keeping information secret

DIS: on privacy

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Giving karma to another person may be done by sending a private > notification to them ... Proto-CFJs for discussion: 1. A message sent via a Discussion forum, addressing (in the message text) a player known to post to the Discussi

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

Imo the metagame of how I think the tournament is supposed to work will be something like this: You give 3 daily Karma and gain 3 daily Karma due to symmetric trades ("Aiyo I give u a Karma for a Karma" "ok sounds cool, ty") and end up with a huge tie with everyone else who has done the same (dili

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > The winner of this tournament shall be the person who is able to gain > the most karma, described below, over the course of the 4 week game. What if there's a tie? If you want ties to have multiple winners, typical is to use "person

Re: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Birthday Tournament

For 10 shinies (or a similar favor) I'm up for being someone's meatpuppet for purposes of winning the tournament (You can't publicly post about your actions, but I could publicly post them for you, for example, as well as feed you Karma). Please contact me privately to cuddleb...@gmail.com if you'