I experienced this same issue in my mail program.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 29, 2017, at 7:40 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
> On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the n
On 07/29/2017 06:30 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the
new and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more
carefully, I was about to complain that it was now too late for you to
move to reconsideration.
It is possible that
My terminal email reader shows no formatting distinction between the new
and old parts of your message. As such, until I read more carefully, I was
about to complain that it was now too late for you to move to
reconsideration.
It is possible that the raw html format version contains some kind
On Jul 29, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote:
> Proposal "Agoraculture":
I’m intensely positive about the bones of this proposal, and hope to see it
developed into something we can enact. Voting strength is an interesting
(bordering on dangerous) gameplay element, and this creates novel
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 10:12 -0700, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote:
> I would like to register as a player.
Welcome to Agora!
On Jul 29, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Welcome!
>
> Just as a note, you normally have to be quite precise with your
> language when taking actions in Agora (registrati
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 10:12 -0700, Ajay Kumar Raja wrote:
> I would like to register as a player.
Welcome!
Just as a note, you normally have to be quite precise with your
language when taking actions in Agora (registration is an exception,
which is why this (probably) works). Saying that you'd li
I have looked again and believe the sequence of events is convoluted
and includes both a failed recusal (sent to A-D) and a failed second
motion to reconsider (you can only file one) but the long and short of
it is that there exists a final judgement which was not mooted (it was
one vote short and
On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 00:34 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
> > Real idea: Ratify the Ruleset every Read the Ruleset Week.
> Seconded.
I like this idea, but it should be a tradition that we do so via
proposal, as opposed to something automatic in the ru
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:44 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> P.S. Honourable Arbitor, it may have been useful had you spelled out
> that this was a moot specifically. We don’t have those often and many
> players, myself included, are unfamiliar with them. I nearly forgot
> to spell out that I was AFFI
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 22:29 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> It is no longer possible for me to impose summary judgement on
> Cuddlebeam, as e is presently not a player. I actually do have a good
> argument for why a card would be appropriate, but it’s irrelevant, as
> carding Cuddlebeam now would not
10 matches
Mail list logo
