After reflection, I favor solution 2. We should limit the number of
times the Arbitor can be payed in a week (maybe 3-5 or something). It
seems to be simple while also scaling with workload, up to a point.
-Aris
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I'm tired, so I'll have to
Yeah, I misread the CFJs.
-Aris
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> On both? From your argument, it sounds like the proposal text contains the
> comment (second CFJ true) but it is stripped when adopting.
>
> That’s a good enough answer for me. I retract those CFJs.
>
> Gae
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
I don't think I ever did this. For each intent where it is possible, I do
so.
The actor SHOULD publish a list of supporters if the action
depends on support, and a list of objectors if it depends on
objections.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
That is correct, I have just observed that. In my tenure, I have been failing
to do that. In the future, I will and if anyone CoEs I will provide older ones.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Aug 27, 2017, at 6:58 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> I believe the
I believe the weekly report includes all changes to agencies - I had
interpreted the creation of an agency as a change that would require the
full text to be included in the weekly?
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 14:27 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
That is published monthly. However, the text of that agency has not yet been
published in a monthly report.
Below, is the resolution of the intent:
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Quazie
> Subject: Re: BUS: Use me
> Date: August 21, 2017 at 6:18:38 PM EDT
> To: Agora Business
> Reply-To:
Actually its all good.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:41 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> Coe: Ienpw III and tmanthe2nd are not players.
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>>
>>
Coe: Ienpw III and tmanthe2nd are not players.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
>Registrar's Weekly Report
> --
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Superintendent’s Weekly Report
>
> Short List of agencies:
>
> ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> BÖÖ - Head: Quazie
> GII - Head: Gaelan
> GOD - Head: Quazie
> MKD - Head: Gaelan
> PRN - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasti
CoE incoming. Wrong version.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Aug 27, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> Superintendent's Weekly Report
>
> Short List of agencies:
>
> ASC - Head: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> BÖÖ
Not my proposal, I think you're confusing me with someone else.
-Aris
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 2:09 PM V.J Rada wrote:
> Good, ok. So we're all winners, and a proposal adopted June 21st by
> aris changed the text to "without".
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
Good, ok. So we're all winners, and a proposal adopted June 21st by
aris changed the text to "without".
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> [Note also reward claim is at the bottom of this judgement].
>
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
>> > > {{I call a CFJ on "A pla
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> Instead of choosing between AP and Shinies, players can create CFJs and
> Pend proposals and automatically create Debts. As proposed, there's no
> upper limit on Debts. The downsides of debts are being locked out of
> stamps and auctions, and I'd add the ag
However, then the judge has to share the CFJ price with the arbitor.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Aug 26, 2017, at 2:19 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> The number of AP CFJs is naturally limited, so there’s an upper cap on pay
> for those. Shiny C
14 matches
Mail list logo
