DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3553 reassigned to o

2017-09-01 Thread V.J Rada
"As a card was issued, it’s clear that the level of sloppy editing did rise to the level required to meet the CFJ 3472 standard" I don't believe card issuance is precedential like that in any way. On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > First, the procedural parts, and a note: > >

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Organization Repeal

2017-09-01 Thread Gaelan Steele
I don’t support this. I see little harm in keeping an interesting game mechanic in the ruleset, especially if we make it clear that it is not necessary for beginners to understand. If necessary, we could add a rule along the lines of {{{ There is a report switch called idleness with values Idle

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Organization Repeal

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 05:01 +, Aris Merchant wrote: > Everyone (not directed at o in particular) e is a singular gender > neutral pronoun. Gender-neutral /and/ sentience-neutral. This works well in situations where you allow legal documents to become players and need a pronoun for them. I agr

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Organization Repeal

2017-09-01 Thread Aris Merchant
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:54 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: > My proposal would have inadvertently allowed non-players to keep eir shiny > balances, which I did not intend. I withdraw the proposal “Organization > Repeal” and submit the following proposal in its place: Everyone (not directed at o in par

Re: DIS: Severability

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 21:15 -0700, Owen Jacobson wrote: > Are proposal clauses severable? > > Specifically, if Proposal A in a batch repeals rule N, and Proposal B > in the same batch amends rule N without considering what should > happen if Proposal A passes, does the amendment happen, fail to >

DIS: Severability

2017-09-01 Thread Owen Jacobson
Are proposal clauses severable? Specifically, if Proposal A in a batch repeals rule N, and Proposal B in the same batch amends rule N without considering what should happen if Proposal A passes, does the amendment happen, fail to happen, or invalidate all of Proposal B? -o signature.asc Des

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3553 reassigned to o

2017-09-01 Thread Owen Jacobson
Apple’s TouchBar is a bloody menace. Expect the full and correct judgement, on the correct list, shortly. -o > On Sep 1, 2017, at 8:50 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > First, the procedural parts, and a note: > > On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:42 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> I point my finger at P

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3553 reassigned to o

2017-09-01 Thread Owen Jacobson
First, the procedural parts, and a note: On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:42 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > I point my finger at P.S.S. for violations of Rule 2143, which states > that: "A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or > misleading while performing an official duty, or within

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

2017-09-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: player has pledged not to judge a CFJ. ihope (who changed names several times, and I think might now be Tanner Swett, although I'm not 100% sure on that) pledged not to judge CFJ 1984. There was some movement to Latest Registrar's Report lists em as Zachar

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 23:41 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 08:35 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > > "a pledge to violate the judge's judicial duty" > > > > Did I do that? Sorry. > > Apparently it was CuddleBeam who did that on a different CFJ in a > similar thread. Sorry for any confusi

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 08:35 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > "a pledge to violate the judge's judicial duty" > > Did I do that? Sorry. Apparently it was CuddleBeam who did that on a different CFJ in a similar thread. Sorry for any confusion. (I think some people got confused earlier in the message I was

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

2017-09-01 Thread V.J Rada
"a pledge to violate the judge's judicial duty" Did I do that? Sorry. Obviously everyone should vote REMIT. On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > I initiate the Agoran Decision to determine public confidence in the > judgement of CFJ 3537. (Some context: the text of the CFJ is "T

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > To be clear, I think your proposed fix of "making lots of simple ways to > earn shinies" would work just as well as a fixed basic income, as long as > there are enough of those things from the beginning for non-officer players > to do, that they can have s

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal of CFJ 3537

2017-09-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:26 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:12 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > > > I initiate the Agoran Decision to determine public confidence in > the > > > judgement of CFJ 3537. > >  > > I vote REMIT. The original jud

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday > >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players. > > This is where I disagree, primari

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Nicholas Evans
I withdraw the proposal titled Debts. On Sep 1, 2017 1:21 AM, "Aris Merchant" wrote: > nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as > in the next day or two). > > -Aris > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans wrote: > >> >> >> On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wro