I don't think it's valid: I vividly remember that election being
initiated, although never resolved.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> If the Decision identified below is valid, I vote on it as follows:
>
>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> IN CASE
"e tried to have Agora transfer em the FLOATING value, not the SHINY value."
I think you mean STAMP value :)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I discovered two problems with Cuddle’s attempt. The first, which I believe
> is sufficient to make it fail, is that e tried to hav
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 06:43 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
>> Sorry yeah, I do accept this as true (sorry I got the rules wrong last
>> night) but because PSS is interested in fighting it I call a CFJ with
>> the statement "G is the Herald". He deputis
I discovered two problems with Cuddle’s attempt. The first, which I believe is
sufficient to make it fail, is that e tried to have Agora transfer em the
FLOATING value, not the SHINY value. This means that VJ got his rewards. My
other reason remains classified.
I’d advise that VJ still refrain
On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:58 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>>> Repeal rule 2457 ("Lockout").
>>
>> This isn't technically tied to Organizations, but I agree with
>> repealing it anyway just because it's likely to become a dead-end
>> mechanic with
OK, I'll hoard my possible Shinies.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:13 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
>> I receive a reward for my revised ADoP report. I go from 0 to 5 shinies.
>
> If CuddleBeam’s mass destruction of Shinies worked, then Agora had exactly
> z
On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:13 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I receive a reward for my revised ADoP report. I go from 0 to 5 shinies.
If CuddleBeam’s mass destruction of Shinies worked, then Agora had exactly zero
shinies at this time and this didn’t work.
I’d very much appreciate if neither of you spent any
Accepted. That column obviously doesn't self-ratify so it's not a
_real_ CoE, but accepted yes.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:40 AM V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>> Effective as of 4pm AEST, 9 Sep 2017.
>>
>> > Office Holder Since Last Ele
"I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office election"
FYI I'm not resolving this.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all
> should vote for me, folks.
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen
I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all
should vote for me, folks.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:51 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister,
>> Herald, ADoP. and R
I pledge not to reveal or exploit the information without the consent of Gaelan.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Good enough. I’ll email you in a second. I’m probably being too careful here,
> but just in case: let it be known that I possess the ideas contained in the
> p
I retract. G is the herald, accepted.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I am not interested in fighting it.
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:44 V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>> Sorry yeah, I do accept this as true (sorry I got the rules wrong last
>> night) but because PSS
Affixed is a new draft. Notable changes include the addition of
section 1.4 with some tweaks to existing rules, adding sustenance
(read monthly fees), a few power tweaks, and several additions to the
protected actions list. Also included are numerous requested fixes and
typo corrections. I think I
Due to quantity would be my guess. The rule reads "a stamp", the attempt
was made for "all stamps". It seems to me that the rules requires an
announcement for each stamp that the player wishes to destroy.
On Sep 6, 2017 11:39 PM, "Gaelan Steele" wrote:
This probably didn’t succeed. I will (priva
This probably didn’t succeed. I will (privately) explain why to anybody who
pledges not to reveal or exploit the information until I do, probably after the
next floating value update.
Gaelan
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Small re-attempt because what I just did likely d
One of the reaosns is that they're eligible for Welcome Packages to drain
Agora to tactically stall out having other people gain any cash from Agora
(for example, during an auction).
I have my reasons lol, I just don't like to tell them.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Co
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:32 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Consent, not support. This requires 60%.
Oh, so it does. I retract my complaint - the two looked the same at first
glance.
> Thanks for the reminder; I pend this with AP.
>
> P.S. To clarify: this is not an attempt to kick out Cuddle or
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 12:56 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> I create the following proposal “Not So Cuddly Now” with AI 1 by Gaelan: {
> diff --git a/rules/How to Join and Leave Agora b/rules/How to Join and Leave
> Agora
> index 4683d3d..962eb2c 100644
> --- a/rules/How to Join and Leave Agora
> +
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
> > I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
> > what I've written?
>
> It'd be pretty bad
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:34 PM grok (caleb vines)
wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2017 9:24 PM, "Aris Merchant" <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> I CFJ on the followin
On Sep 6, 2017 9:24 PM, "Aris Merchant"
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> I CFJ on the following (using AP if I am a Player) and barring
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>
>> G. and Cuddlebeam, and no
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 18:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> I CFJ on the following (using AP if I am a Player) and barring
>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:
>>
>> G. and Cuddlebeam, and no one else, have won the game via tournament
>>
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
> I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
> what I've written?
It'd be pretty bad for the game if a person's actual intentions (which
Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what
I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of
what I've written?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most
It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most votes
*now*) or a conditional vote (whomever has the most votes at the end of the
voting period). If I had to guess, I'd go with the first one.
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I vote for whoever has the most votes
Typical G. "well, in my day" incoming:
Conditionals in general crept in through the back door. Before
conditional voting, they were mostly very simple, e.g. "If I haven't
already payed by AP, I pay by Shiny." Usually this was in the context
of quoting a past questionable action and attempting
Apology accepted. To be fair, it was reasonably clear for both of you,
it's just that ais523 was replying to my message, which made me
wonder.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:31 PM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> Oops. I didn't read the quote text and thought you were asking me. Sorry for
> the snar
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:26 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Mine, or nichdel's? Mine was sent to a-d, and is extremely vague
> (what
> exactly is a 'provocation' anyway)? And no, there isn't a time limit,
> although there is one potential way out of any SHALL at the moment.
Was primarily thinking of
Oops. I didn't read the quote text and thought you were asking me. Sorry
for the snark, Aris
-grok
On Sep 6, 2017 7:28 PM, "grok (caleb vines)" wrote:
I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
-grok
On Sep 6, 2017 7:27 PM, "Aris Merchant"
wrote:
Mine, or nichdel's? Mine was sent to a
I think the answer to that is pretty obvious.
-grok
On Sep 6, 2017 7:27 PM, "Aris Merchant"
wrote:
Mine, or nichdel's? Mine was sent to a-d, and is extremely vague (what
exactly is a 'provocation' anyway)? And no, there isn't a time limit,
although there is one potential way out of any SHALL a
Mine, or nichdel's? Mine was sent to a-d, and is extremely vague (what
exactly is a 'provocation' anyway)? And no, there isn't a time limit,
although there is one potential way out of any SHALL at the moment.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Is there a time limit or othe
On Sep 6, 2017 7:23 PM, "Alex Smith" wrote:
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:17 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> > Since you lack either empathy or theory of mind and only react to
> > personal
> > damages:
> >
> > I pledge to vote AGAINST on all proposals
Ah, OK. I look forwards to when you do, then.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying not to do the 7 versions thing this time. I haven't added
> ais523's upkeep fee thing yet, as it's more complicated than most of
> these correction
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:17 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> > Since you lack either empathy or theory of mind and only react to
> > personal
> > damages:
> >
> > I pledge to vote AGAINST on all proposals created or pended by
> > Cuddle Beam.
> >
>
I'm trying not to do the 7 versions thing this time. I haven't added
ais523's upkeep fee thing yet, as it's more complicated than most of
these corrections, and I don't want to publish a new draft until I do.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I see a lot of "done's" and
I concur with Aris, this was a bit harsh, but I do concur with the sentiment.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 8:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/06/17 19:05, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> >From a speech act theory standpoint, any spe
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
>
> On 09/06/17 19:05, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> >From a speech act theory standpoint, any speech act already encodes
> conditionals (that the preconditions match, that the way I invoke it
> performs it, that others recognizes the previous two points
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I read this last night, slept on it, skimmed it again, and read the replies.
> Here’s my initial thoughts, thin as they are - I had more, but Gaelan and
> ais523 have already covered most of my inquiries.
>
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 11:10 PM, Ari
I see a lot of "done's" and "fixed" but I don't see a "latest version"
part. Please post it to check it out. (I do a lot/want to do a lot of
Agency stuff lol. It's my favorite mechanic, and if you make it even
better, then, I'd be super grateful)
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Aris Merchant <
tho
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
> rules
> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
> have
>From a speech act theory standpoint, any speech act already encodes
conditionals (that the preconditions match, that the way I invoke it
performs it, that others recognizes the previous two points, that everyone
assumes genuine intent). Allowing more conditionals to be included is a
natural extens
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
>> have no effect on the behavior of this proposal. They are not part of any
>> rules
>> created or amended herein, and may be considered for all game purposes to
>>
Your conditional doesn't meet it's own requirements. This arguably
requires me to look through all CFJs, to make sure the doctrine hasn't
been overturned. I therefore determine that you haven't submitted a
proposal. I'd also just add it to the last paragraph, rather than
making a new one.
-Aris
O
On 09/06/17 18:47, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I think that's great for Agora but if its based on a CFJ or tradition,
> that's more of the "implicit rules" (or "obscure rules") phenomenon
> which I dislike. Conditional-ing stuff is as powerful as a real
> mechanic imo, and one of the most powerful ones. L
On 09/06/17 18:16, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Note: we have explicit conditional voting, but not conditional
> explicit action-doing in general.
>
> I'm in favor of conditional action-doing in general because it's
> another useful tool for doing stuff (...and the rules are silent on
> the issue).
Voting
Oh, no, we definitely have conditional actioning (consider that a
nonce). The condition just has to be evaluable at the time it is said,
so no future conditionals. At least, that's my understanding.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Note: we have explicit conditional vot
Note: we have explicit conditional voting, but not conditional explicit
action-doing in general.
I'm in favor of conditional action-doing in general because it's another
useful tool for doing stuff (...and the rules are silent on the issue).
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Aris Merchant <
though
Could work as a good place for ads too.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Josh T wrote:
> I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if
> deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I
> intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for
I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if
deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I
intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for articles if
they wish to submit them and I choose to include them.
Please find a proto-newspap
I am not interested in fighting it.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:44 V.J Rada wrote:
> Sorry yeah, I do accept this as true (sorry I got the rules wrong last
> night) but because PSS is interested in fighting it I call a CFJ with
> the statement "G is the Herald". He deputised for it in order to give
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 06:43 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> Sorry yeah, I do accept this as true (sorry I got the rules wrong last
> night) but because PSS is interested in fighting it I call a CFJ with
> the statement "G is the Herald". He deputised for it in order to give
> champion to all the winners.
I gained it above, w/ G's message.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:48 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
>> I award myself white and ultraviolet ribbons
>
> What's the timing on the Ultraviolet ribbon like? I can see how the
> White ribbon works. Did you gain Cha
Oh, sorry: as is obvious from my attempt to re-start it, I thought you were
talking
about the Quill election.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> The argument that it failed was a combination of the ability to add to the
> pool of options mid-decision and the confusion
Was there any confusion about this one? I thought we were confused about
the Victory election.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:24 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> IN CASE IT DIDN'T START:
>
> I deputize for the Herald to initiate an Agoran Decision for the Silver
> Quill 2016.
> The vote collector is the Heral
I can't do it first because there is no SHALL requiring resolution, the
SHALL only applies if the initiation is required.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:21 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> At a glance, that's messier and I can't look into it as my lunch break is
> almost
> over. That leaves an opening for PS
The argument that it failed was a combination of the ability to add to the
pool of options mid-decision and the confusion regarding the definition of
announcement as a candidate.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:20 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> That's another CFJ then - from what I can tell from searching yo
That's another CFJ then - from what I can tell from searching you never said
it didn't work, and I'm not sure I see anything wrong with the announcement -
can you point me to any arguments that it failed?
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I don't believe that it had ev
I disagree, I judged the CFJ that noted that it did, indeed, start
correctly. [CFJ 3513]
The problem with the victory election rule is that there is no requirement
for the herald to every resolve the decision.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti
I don't believe that it had ever correctly started.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:06 Quazie wrote:
> I vote for G in the Herald election if it is still ongoing.
>
> I request that the Herald finally tally the results of the Victory
> Election held many moons ago.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:03 PM
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If I was the Herald before the below, I resolve the below decision as
> indicated (without deputization).
I think you can deputise for your own office as long as the other
deputisation criteria are met (e.g. the action being late).
--
ais52
That's not how the Rule actually reads, even if it's more convenient.
Please CFJ if you disagree with the plain reading of the rule:
- The win was announced over 14 days from when I deputized.
- There was no open CFJ when the win was announced, nor when I
deputized.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publi
I have read the rules. However, I believe the question is as to when the case
was closed.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> Good poin
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 20:55 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> I also award myself a violet ribbon for deputisation.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:42 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> > I once again cause myself to receive an ultraviolet ribbon.
> > --
> > From V.J Rada
a) NttPF, b) that's the wrong colour of ribbon a
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:37 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:48 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> > I award myself white and ultraviolet ribbons
>
> What's the timing on the Ultraviolet ribbon like? I can see how the
> White ribbon works. Did you gain Champion within the previous week? (
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 19:24 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> E could stash his money in an organization.
FWIW, I saw this scam ages ago, decided it was too risky to try to use
(partly due to the risk of accidentally deregistering myself, but
mostly because AFAICT the Shinies would be stuck in the Or
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I am becum reg1stored for dis geim of thigners and monies and offises wich we
> pley ere.
> By paying 1 AP. I CFJ: "Cuddlebeam is now eligible to claim another Welcome
> Package".
Counterarguments:
The action in question is registering.
To me, this st
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Good point. Given the lack of a SHALL, no requirement was unfulfilled
> and he didn’t take the office. If you want to CFJ this, you can, but
> it seems clear to me.
Read the rules pls. The SHALL requirement is in R649:
Thank you. I think mainly in UTC.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:09 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> Australian eastern standard time. 4pm aest = 6am gmt.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>> W
Australian eastern standard time. 4pm aest = 6am gmt.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> What is AEST?
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Sep 6, 2017, at 6:40 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>>
>> AEST
>
--
>Fr
What is AEST?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 6:40 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> AEST
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
You can’t I already did.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 6:42 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> I once again cause myself to receive an ultraviolet ribbon.
> --
> From V.J Rada
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using G
I also award myself a violet ribbon for deputisation.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:42 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> I once again cause myself to receive an ultraviolet ribbon.
> --
> From V.J Rada
--
>From V.J Rada
That is correct I had failed to award the title, explicitly. I was intending
for the award to be made implicitly by their inclusion.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Kerim Ay
What things could be lost forever?
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 12:40 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> That and other things which could be lost forever if they are deregistered so
> I'm a bit wary for now.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at
We did that with I think o or omd, a while ago.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:55 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Actually, is being non-registered a requirement to register? Couldn't
> registered people just... Register again?
>
>
Why? This process is intended to deregister anyone who isn’t participating.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 11:36 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I object.
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:34 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
> Without objection, I inte
It's 12:30 local, so I'm going to sleep. I just overreacted a bit and
called elections. We'll see how it works out. If that CoE was right your
deputization failed anyway. We'll see how it all works out.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:38 AM V.J Rada wrote:
> It is overdue enough, it was last pu
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
> I won't accept or deny this until e responds.
>
> Unrelated, are you voting on the elections other than Herald?
Yah I'll vote when I see if there's multiple people who want any of
these or not. competitive elections are more fun :)
It is overdue enough, it was last published 14 August by my reckoning.
Sorry yeah I did notice the CoE, it was my bad taking it. I can resign
the office? And you can take it then.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> First of all, I don't think it's overdue enough. Second, the r
First of all, I don't think it's overdue enough. Second, the reason I
haven't published lately is because there's an outstanding CoE, tied to a
judicial case that was never judged, and the report is basicly empty
anyway. Try to ask before you take offices, would you? If you actually hold
this now,
I won't accept or deny this until e responds.
Unrelated, are you voting on the elections other than Herald?
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
>> Office Holder Since Last Election Can Elect[1]
>> -
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
> you can take reportor
that's a useless job - unwanted by me. :P
you can take reportor
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
>> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister,
>> Herald, ADoP. and Reportor.
>>
>> I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the new Herald. The vote
>>
NTTPF
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
I point my finger at Quazie for never resolving this CoE. I accept this CoE.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
On 08/21/17 18:46, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Through the mechanism described in the agency “Quazie’s Autonomous Zeal,” I
cau
84 matches
Mail list logo
