I think that would work. I've gone ahead and changed it. I'll go ahead and
submit the proposal now.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
> > The reason why they're called Medals of Honour is because in order to
> declare
> > yourself elig
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
>>
>>> About Silly proposals I am vexed:Of the rule's intention I am perplexed;
>>> Ought the proposal's mood be most merry,
>>> Or it's meaning and tone be cont
Do not forget, please
It's not seven five seven
But five seven five
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ørjan Johansen
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
>>>
About Silly p
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:31 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Do not forget, please
> It's not seven five seven
> But five seven five
>
Haiku need not be
Five-seven-five syllables.
It's just a guideline.
Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a Medal
of
Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have to
keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald I'd probably put this in my
monthly
report anyway).
Also there's a timing problem. "In
Oh, last thing: you should throw in this Proposal a repeal of the Victory
Elections
(Rule 2482). This is a much better replacement and we don't need both.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a
> Medal of
> Honour on
Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues:
- A player does not stop becoming eligible at the end of the month. I would
say "eligible for a Medal of Honour that month", to avoid this.
- If a player incorrectly announces eligibility, this could invalidate the
entire vote later. Not su
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Just a note: It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has a
> Medal of
> Honour once it's awarded. So it's like trust tokens that people just have
> to
> keep track - is that intentional? (As Herald I'd probably put this in
[sorry for double post, Gmail doesn't have a good way to reply to multiple
emails at once. I'm probably going to switch to a desktop client soon.]
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues:
> - A player does not stop becoming
9 matches
Mail list logo
