Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
I've been overly paranoid sometimes and used stuff like "I bid X coins and here's some tasty salt: F71FEC2C0685313F98D883EFFFC36F" On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > It's weird, I can't imagine how I would pronounce "SHA". I suspect the cause > is just that I've only ever seen it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
It's weird, I can't imagine how I would pronounce "SHA". I suspect the cause is just that I've only ever seen it written down and never actually spoken about it, so I've never _needed_ to pronounce it, but it's actually quite disturbing not being able to sound it in my head like with other

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread Reuben Staley
Obviously, it is ess-aych-ay-five-twelve. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018, 08:11 ATMunn wrote: > > On 7/1/2018 8:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > >> Also > >> add in a new paragraph "Rules and Contracts notwithstanding, no > >> Announcer may ever bid on an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, ATMunn wrote: > On 7/1/2018 8:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > Also > > > add in a new paragraph "Rules and Contracts notwithstanding, no > > > Announcer may ever bid on an Auction they are Announcing". > > > > This is a massive

Re: DIS: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8053-8057 (fwd)

2018-07-03 Thread ATMunn
Yes, I received all three copies. On 7/1/2018 3:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: AND: just for some final ambiguity correction, since the below was the first message sent to OFF to my knowledge since omd fixed things, if the below message wasn't sent via OFF, I resolve the proposals as indicated.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread ATMunn
There are plenty of hashers online. You can just google "sha hash online" or something like that and there will be a bunch to choose from. Just put in the original text and they should spit out the hash at you, which you can then copy and paste. On 7/1/2018 8:15 PM, Rebecca wrote: I guess

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread ATMunn
I'd stick to one defined thing such as the SHA hash. I get that just saying "reasonably verifiable method" allows people to be creative, but really what we need is not creativity, it's verifiability. (is that a word?) People can push the limits of "reasonably verifiable", which could become a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposals] Feasible Victory & Better Auctions

2018-07-03 Thread ATMunn
On 7/1/2018 8:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: Also add in a new paragraph "Rules and Contracts notwithstanding, no Announcer may ever bid on an Auction they are Announcing". This is a massive disadvantage: It's unfair to ask an officer to completely stay out