NttPF.
I'm not _trying_ to catch you out, I promise...
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 5:24 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Oh come on. That's cruel.
>
> I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible.
>
> I submit and pend the following proposal.
>
Oh come on. That's cruel.
I withdraw my proposal entitled "Revamping movement v3.1" if possible.
I submit and pend the following proposal.
-
Title: Revamping movement v3.2
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-authors: twg, Aris, G., Corona
Amend rule 2003 "Actions in Arcadia" by replacing its text
Sorry, only just noticed this - you changed "force-feed" to "feed" in one place
but missed the other occurrence.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 4, 2018 5:16 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I feel I've given ample time to submit notes on this version.
>
> I withdraw my proposal
8077-8081. The least controversial vote would be PRESENT on the first four
and FOR the last one.
-Aris
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 6:31 AM ATMunn wrote:
> Ok. What are the proposal numbers? I will vote as you did.
>
> On 8/2/2018 6:38 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > Yes and yes, so unfortunately
Ok. What are the proposal numbers? I will vote as you did.
On 8/2/2018 6:38 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Yes and yes, so unfortunately you can't start auctions by contract any more.
Not that that would necessarily be the best method, anyway - I imagine you
wouldn't have any use for the funds
No, it doesn't matter. Moving agora further from zero is a validity
condition for a Notice not a defining one, just like reasoning
On Thu., 2 Aug. 2018, 10:52 pm Cuddle Beam, wrote:
> I move to reconsider. Now that it's not void because of the 4th argument,
> it can still become void become of
6 matches
Mail list logo
