On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 12/5/19 10:14 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> > Can we not try to ratify rulesets the day they're published? Ratifying
> > the ruleset is a big deal because it takes a long time to verify that
> > it's correct, has had no scams inserted
On 12/5/19 10:13 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
There are a lot of paragraphs using indentation instead of the
customary blank lines. Which is probably completely legal, but still...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
Dammit, it looks like my email client did something insane. And no, it
wouldn't be legal since
On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 22:05 -0500, Jason Cobb wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: SLR Ratification
[snip]
> The text of the weekly report published on 6 December 2019 and
> available at [0] is a true and accurate description of the ruleset.
Can we not try to ratify rulesets the
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:10 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
>
> On 12/5/19 9:56 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> >> [This is accurate to the best of my knowledge. It is very likely that
> >> I have missed or messed up something. You can see the changes from
> >> Trigon's last SLR at
On 12/5/19 9:56 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
[This is accurate to the best of my knowledge. It is very likely that
I have missed or messed up something. You can see the changes from
Trigon's last SLR at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/ruleset/tree/dec5.]
I deputise for Rulekeepor to publish the
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Jason Cobb wrote:
[This is accurate to the best of my knowledge. It is very likely that I have
missed or messed up something. You can see the changes from Trigon's last SLR
at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/ruleset/tree/dec5.]
I deputise for Rulekeepor to publish the
6 matches
Mail list logo
