On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 10:43 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 01:05 omd via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > Hmm... Good point. It shouldn't be. The point was to clarify that
> > even if the gamestate doesn't have a list of
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 01:05 omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Hmm... Good point. It shouldn't be. The point was to clarify that
> even if the gamestate doesn't have a list of legal fictions, legal
> fictions can still exist due to rules (which are themselves
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:27 AM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 19:41 omd via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > A rule may state or imply that 'X is treated as if it
> > were Y', but this is considered an attempt to
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 01:10, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> This is certainly a hell of a lot simpler than the alternative. You've
> dealt pretty convincingly with my complaint about generality; it's not
> general, but it looks like the lack of generality doesn't actually
> turn out
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 13:27, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 19:41 omd via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > A rule may state or imply that 'X is treated as if it
> > were Y', but this is considered an attempt to
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 00:41, omd via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 8:17 AM James Cook via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > This is a counter-proto to Alexis's "Ratification by Legal Fiction", in
> > the sense that I think it also fixes the problem of ratification
> > failing due
On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote:
>> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
> ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the
> wrong address. This time for real.
Received, if it helps.
--
Jason Cobb
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote:
> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the
wrong address. This time for real.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Nothing to see here, move along.
Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
Nothing to see here, move along.
On 2/1/20 7:05 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> On 2/1/20 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
>> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a motion to reconsider.
> I self-file a motion to reconsider in CFJ 3788.
>
>
Alright, a less insane and non-procrastinated draft judgement that I can
leave
Warrigal wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 23:54 Tanner Swett via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to award twg the Patent Title of
> > > Baccalaureate of Nomic, subject to the conditions that the person
> > > performing the award pursuant
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 21:25 James Cook via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 2. Do you think my "Last Week in Agora" summaries are useful? Any other
>comments? So far I've acted unilaterally in writing them, just to
>get something started, but I'm open to doing
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, 19:41 omd via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> A rule may state or imply that 'X is treated as if it
> were Y', but this is considered an attempt to redefine X,
> subject to the usual standards for definitions.
>
What's the
14 matches
Mail list logo
