On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 00:35 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:27 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > No it isn't – "the proposal" has a perfectly well-defined meaning in
> > English, and it doesn't make sense to
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:27 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> No it isn't – "the proposal" has a perfectly well-defined meaning in
> English, and it doesn't make sense to interpret it as meaning something
> entirely different.
>
> --
> ais523
>
>
CFJ 3744
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:27 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/15/22 22:02, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > But this is still only one issue you've addressed: you can still totally
> > create something that already exists, you just
On 7/15/22 22:02, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> But this is still only one issue you've addressed: you can still totally
> create something that already exists, you just make it exist again,
> duplicating it. Arbitrarily restricting creation to things that don't exist
> is atextual
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:27 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> No it isn't – "the proposal" has a perfectly well-defined meaning in
> English, and it doesn't make sense to interpret it as meaning something
> entirely different.
I'm saying "the proposal"
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 19:23 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
> It's as if I specified it each time I did the action, since "the
> proposal" is just a shorthand for "a proposal with the following
> attributes".
No it isn't – "the proposal" has a perfectly well-defined meaning in
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 6:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 18:17 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > > In order to force this reading, you'd have to write something like
> > > "81
> > > times, I perform the
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 18:17 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
> > In order to force this reading, you'd have to write something like
> > "81
> > times, I perform the following action: {{{ I submit the following
> > proposal: … }}}", which is a long way away from what you actually
> >
> In order to force this reading, you'd have to write something like "81
> times, I perform the following action: {{{ I submit the following
> proposal: … }}}", which is a long way away from what you actually
> wrote, and I don't think this is a plausible reading of what you
> actually wrote
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 17:31 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to group-file a Motion to Reconsider CFJ 3978.
> (Or ais523 could just self-file and address this which would be cool.)
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 2:52 PM ais523 via agora-business <
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
