On 5/13/23 20:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 2:59 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> A proto to revive the criminal court, revive the appellate court (but
>> only for criminal cases), and fix investigators' obligations with
>> respect to alleged infr
On 5/13/23 15:47, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 18:51]:
>> In Agora, the rules are clear. The clock starts running when the
>> infraction actually occurred, not when it was discovered or reasonably
>> could have been discovered.
> I'd argue this is a
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 2:59 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> A proto to revive the criminal court, revive the appellate court (but
> only for criminal cases), and fix investigators' obligations with
> respect to alleged infractions:
So, for a full criminal trial resulting in Blots, i
A proto to revive the criminal court, revive the appellate court (but
only for criminal cases), and fix investigators' obligations with
respect to alleged infractions:
Title: Court for the Responsible Investigation of Major Events and
Associated Criminal Touch-ups (CRIME ACT)
# Section 0: Restori
It's helpful for me, as a player, who is particularly invested in Proposals.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023, juan via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> secretsnail9 via agora-official [2023-05-13 05:07]:
> > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
>
> I vote as follows.
>
> > 8972*
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 18:51]:
> In Agora, the rules are clear. The clock starts running when the
> infraction actually occurred, not when it was discovered or reasonably
> could have been discovered.
I'd argue this is a problem. If the investigation is to determine if there
w
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:17 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Also why is radiance at power 1.5 in the first place?
>
Was a minor design choice: because (in drafting points) I thought the
win condition itself (100+ points) should be a trifle more protected
than the award conditions.
On 5/13/23 06:13, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>> 8974~ Janet 1.0 Plan B
>>
> AGAINST (Radiance gameplay is pretty much all we have, also this wouldn't
> even remove radiance (power 1.5). I'd rather see a fix or replacement
> instead of a repeal, and my draft should
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:34 PM ais523 via agora-business
wrote:
> > Amend R478 by deleting the following text:
> >
> > Freedom of speech being essential for the healthy functioning of
> > any non-Imperial nomic, it is hereby resolved that no Player shall
> > be prohibited
9 matches
Mail list logo
