DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7516-7525

2013-07-12 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I vote FOR 7522, 7523, 7519, 7516, and 7518. If it is possible to vote on 7517, I vote FOR it. I ENDORSE OMD for 7524. I ENDORSE SCSHUNT for 7525. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, omd wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it. For

DIS: Re: BUS: Inactivity intents

2013-07-08 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I object. (However, I'm definitely not treating Agora right good currently, much less forever.) On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Wes Contreras wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, omd wrote: >> I intend, without objection, to make each of the following players inactive: >> FSX >> Ienpw II

Re: DIS: Agora XX: CFJ assigned to FSX

2013-06-27 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
Rule 113, while implying that forfeiture usually is a choice, does not appear to indicate that a person may not be forced to do it. The only thing it seems to imply is that you cannot prevent a person from doing it. Therefore, if a person is forced to forfeit, they have forfeited, and I judge this

Re: DIS: Endgame XX

2013-06-26 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
For. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > FOR. =) > > ~ Roujo > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: >> I propose the following rule: >> >> At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the most >> points wins the game. In the event of

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal

2013-06-26 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
For. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Michael Norrish wrote: > I vote FOR this proposal. > > Michael > > On 26/06/13 6:20 PM, Chuck Carroll wrote: >> I propose that Rule 302, or a Rule formerly having had the number 302 >> (if there is exactly one such rule) be amended to read “Players whose >> p

Re: DIS: Agora XX: proposal

2013-06-26 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
Against. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:43 AM, omd wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Malcolm Ryan wrote: >> >> Let's make this interesting. >> >> I propose that a rule be enacted reading: >> >> "If a player proposes a rule change which is not adopted at the end of its >> voting period, that pl

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal

2013-06-25 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
FSX is my name for Agora XX. Flameshadowxeroshin is too cumbersome for most purposes, so I don't use it very much. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Steven Gardner wrote: > Either 'Flameshadowxeroshin' or 'FSX' will serve as a name, IMO. > > -- > Steve Gardn

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal

2013-06-24 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I vote for this proposal. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Steven Gardner wrote: > I vote for this Proposal. > > > On 25 June 2013 00:10, Steven Gardner wrote: >> >> I submit the following proposal: >> >> Enact a new Rule which reads: >> >> Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker

Re: DIS: Agora XX: The Rights of the Majority

2013-06-24 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
Against. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Charles Walker > wrote: >> I propose to amend Rule 324 by deleting the first sentence. >> >> -- Walker > > Against, based on a lack of suitable replacement.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A CFJ

2013-06-18 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
And I got the numbers wrong yet again. Oh well. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, omd wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin > wrote: >> CFJ: Only sentient artificial intelligence systems are second-class persons. > > Note that "person" is cur

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal

2013-06-18 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I vote in favor. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:19 PM, wrote: > I propose that Rule 110 be transmuted to mutable. > > Chuck > >

Re: DIS: Agora XX: Proposal

2013-06-18 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I vote in favor. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 18 Jun 2013, at 13:08, "Chuck Carroll" wrote: > > I propose that Rule 211 be amended to read: > > > > “Voters who voted against proposals which are adopted receive 2 points > apiece. Players whose proposals are adopted

DIS: Re: BUS: Speaker CFJ

2013-06-17 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
Rule 103, if interpreted in modern Agoran terminology, to the best of my understanding, does not mean that Michael Norrish could possibly take hold of the office of Speaker, it means that he is and always has been the Speaker and every other Speaker has been an impostor. According to CFJ 2154, Mich

DIS: Count me in

2013-06-17 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I join Agora XX.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7471-7472

2013-06-15 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
7471 FOR, 7472 ENDORSE WOGGLE. On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:36 PM, omd wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible > voters are the active first-class players at the time of this > distribution, the vote

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Maybe it's better this way.

2013-03-25 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I declared myself active yesterday, I think. I did not deregister. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Flameshadowxeroshin wrote: > > I change my nickname to FSX. > > According to the last registrar's report of Feb 1, you

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Elections

2012-01-30 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
Just for clarification, I intend to endorse Wooble.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: You're a man^Wnomic now!

2011-07-04 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I registered and I don't see any record of my deregistration. On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 2 July 2011 19:43, Flameshadowxeroshin > wrote: >> If I am inactive, I become active. > > You're not a player, nor is it Agora's Birthday any more. > > -- > Charles Walker >

DIS: Re: BUS: You're a man^Wnomic now!

2011-07-02 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
If I am inactive, I become active. On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:37 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:31 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Sean Hunt >> wrote: >> > I come off hold. >> > >> > Proposal: 18th Birthday Bash >> > {{{ >> > Award the patent title "Com

Re: DIS: This message may not have been sent by

2011-07-02 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I did get one for yours, Charles, but not for anyone else's. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > > On 1 July 2011 18:46, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > > It's shocking mailman doesn't sell your organs to Nigeria to fund > > Stallman's crack habit. > > Haha, look at this guy who's ne

Re: DIS: Anew

2011-02-05 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I'd recommend doing something like a rethink. Have the same general game structure, but done differently. Things like "currency" and offices might be fun to change. On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > > Proto: Initiate an Agoran Decision to repeal each rule in the Ruleset.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cleaning

2010-12-21 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
The only possible one, perhaps? On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:40 PM, omd wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: > > I intend to clean Rule 2314 (The List of Succession) > > With what method? >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Briefly Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6908-6913

2010-12-06 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
> 6908 O 1 2.0 G Pay To Sit AGAINST > 6909 O 1 3.0 scshunt Carrot Juice FOR > 6910 O 1 3.0 omd Forgery is Forgery AGAINST > 6911 O 1 1.0 Murphy Fear cleanup PRESENT > 6912 O 0 1.0 Murphy Restore the terrible choice AGA

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal for amendment of 'Church and State'

2010-11-12 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
I had basically no idea of what I was doing when I started. I just read the ruleset enough to understand what I had to do. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:13, Flameshadowxeroshin > wrote: >> >> I submit the following propos

DIS: Re: Re: BUS: Registering

2010-11-10 Thread Flameshadowxeroshin
What I meant to say was "person", not "citizen". That was a mistake on my part. I also won't be sending any more MIME messages; that was another mistake. Also, hello!