On Sun, 21 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
I think that’s what must have happened, because in my email sent folder,
it’s not quoted. Does it come out quoted in your inboxes (as
distinguished from the website)? If not, interesting question which one
is authoritative—the website or our inboxes.
I
I think that’s what must have happened, because in my email sent folder, it’s
not quoted. Does it come out quoted in your inboxes (as distinguished from the
website)? If not, interesting question which one is authoritative—the website
or our inboxes.
> On Oct 21, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Ørjan Joh
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Ah, darn it. (This message best viewed in a fixed-width font.) I don't
know whether this would have worked anyway but it would have been
amusing.
That looked quoted, so I'm pretty sure would be excluded by the principles
in G.s recent (although c
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
Oh crud. That wasn’t supposed to be in quotes. Looks like I only
unquoted the second line of the intent, not both lines. That’s very
annoying.
I've often seen messages with a first new line after quoted content
accidentally quoted like that. I've assum
twg wrote:
> The CFJ is something that I'd been toying with for a while as a potential scam
> idea. I hadn't tried using it properly because I'm actually pretty sure it
> doesn't work. ''I intend to Declare Apathy Without Objection, specifying
> myself." is found in a message and then someone else
Oh crud. That wasn’t supposed to be in quotes. Looks like I only unquoted the
second line of the intent, not both lines. That’s very annoying.
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 9:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> [Forgive me, H. Prime Minister].
>
>
> Ok, that one *is* actually buried in quotes.
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
