Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2844-45 assigned to coppro

2010-08-28 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 02:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> For each of these cases, I submit the following gratuitous arguments >> (and apologize for not having included them up front), and intend >> (with 2 support) to appeal its judgement, recommending REMAND without >> prejudice: >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2844-45 assigned to coppro

2010-08-28 Thread ais523
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 02:57 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > For each of these cases, I submit the following gratuitous arguments > (and apologize for not having included them up front), and intend > (with 2 support) to appeal its judgement, recommending REMAND without > prejudice: I support. -- ais523

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2844-45 assigned to coppro

2010-08-28 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > On 08/28/2010 02:47 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> On 08/27/2010 06:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2844 >>> >>> === CFJ 2844 (Interest Index = 0) >>> >>> I have CFJed on this exact statement, excep