On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 18:28, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I very much like this idea! I request that interpretations not be
> installed, at least in the first version, since those are
> controversial.
>
> Also, to clarify, would this include allowing other persons to act on
>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:57 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Now that it looks like the statute reform proposal is going to squeak
> through, I started thinking about where we might first want to create
> non-statute bodies of law. Contracts are the natural choice, but on
>
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:12 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion, wrote:
> This makes a lot of sense. I really like the situation with the Prime
> Minister and Agoran consent of officeholders because it improves the
> nature of the cabinet, but I think we will need to include a
This makes a lot of sense. I really like the situation with the Prime
Minister and Agoran consent of officeholders because it improves the
nature of the cabinet, but I think we will need to include a safeguard
against concentration of offices and create some structure for waiting
people's support
Now that it looks like the statute reform proposal is going to squeak
through, I started thinking about where we might first want to create
non-statute bodies of law. Contracts are the natural choice, but on
reflection, I think that the first test of new fundamental rules of
the game should not be
5 matches
Mail list logo
