DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Alex Smith
Comments in this proto are shown with quote marks; they won't be part of the final proposal, if we propose this one. Protoproposal (AI 2, II 3): Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards: {{{ Cards are a class of assets, restricted to players, whose recordkeepor

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
Er, here's the alternate one - currently just finishing up the card definitions. ais523, how do you want to proceed, pick one or merge? -- [Now with multiple decks!] Create the following Rule, Cards, power 2:

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: Er, here's the alternate one - currently just finishing up the card definitions. ais523, how do you want to proceed, pick one or merge? Probably best to pick yours, as it's more mature, and then merge in a few features of mine. In

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread C-walker
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards: I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place. Otherwise I like it. -- C-walker

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:35 +0100, C-walker wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards: I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place. Otherwise I like it. 2126 has the

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:35 PM, C-walkercharles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards: I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place. Otherwise I

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 13:09, Roger Hickspidge...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:32, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: Er, here's the alternate one - currently just finishing up the card definitions. ais523, how do you

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:35 +0100, C-walker wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alex Smithais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: Replace the text of rule 2126 with the following, and rename it Cards: I suggest repealing 2126 and creating a new rule in its place.

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 13:12 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote: Also, while I agree with ais523 that there should be a maximum hand size (to keep from having to track hundreds of cards for inactive players) I think that hand size should be set much higher than eir proposal suggestedpaticularly if

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: Goethe's proposal, but I agree with ais523cards should replace caste as well. I've secretly hated caste from the get-go - it's too limiting. I'm afraid I've always preferred a default hierarchy for voting that looks like caste; makes medium-term

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 13:26, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote: While several of you may disagree, may I suggest that removing caste is a separate-enough political issue that it deserves its own proposal? Fair enough to me. Based on what I've seen so far I'll be voting for your cards

Re: DIS: Cards proto

2009-06-26 Thread Paul VanKoughnett
While several of you may disagree, may I suggest that removing caste is a separate-enough political issue that it deserves its own proposal? -G. I did, and will do so again (hopefully with bugs fixed) after the implementation of cards.