comex wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is neither appealed within the time limit for doing so
nor sustained on appeal.
Logic error.
In fact, this is not necessary at all. Since AFFIRM reassigns
Eris wrote:
On 11/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
I can't find any style guides that support or even mention this
extension of the serial comma.
You're probably right, but if that humongous sentences had no commas
whatsoever, it would be ugly.
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I don't know that my claim will have any formal support, but I argue
> from common sense (at least it seemed so to me) that omitting the
> comma would be worse. Perhaps this is an argument for moving the
> two items into bulleted paragraphs, or for re
Eris wrote:
On 11/18/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The serial comma's role of disambiguation can be reasonably extended
to lists of two, provided that the items in the list are sufficiently
complex. Furthermore, as demonstrated multiple times in this reply,
there are several other s
On 11/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original sentence is "has not been appealed, or has been sustained" --
> yours is "not appealed, and not sustained"
Woops. Change sustained to overturned then.
> P.S. Is "purport" the word of the month?
Didn't you get the memo?
--
Taral <[EMA
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> On 11/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> > > A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
> > > that is neither appealed within the time limit for doing so
> > > nor susta
On 11/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> > A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
> > that is neither appealed within the time limit for doing so
> > nor sustained on appeal.
>
> Logic error.
It is logically e
On Nov 18, 2007 2:19 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> > I can't find any style guides that support or even mention this
> > extension of the serial comma.
>
> You're probably right, but if that humongous sentences had no commas
> whatsoever, it would
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
> that is neither appealed within the time limit for doing so
> nor sustained on appeal.
Logic error.
In fact, this is not necessary at all. Since AFFIRM reassigns the
judgem
On 11/18/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> > I can't find any style guides that support or even mention this
> > extension of the serial comma.
>
> You're probably right, but if that humongous sentences had no commas
> whatsoever, it would be ugly.
T
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Taral wrote:
> I can't find any style guides that support or even mention this
> extension of the serial comma.
You're probably right, but if that humongous sentences had no commas
whatsoever, it would be ugly.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On 11/18/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The serial comma's role of disambiguation can be reasonably extended
> to lists of two, provided that the items in the list are sufficiently
> complex. Furthermore, as demonstrated multiple times in this reply,
> there are several other situation
Eris wrote:
On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eris wrote:
On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
that is sustained on appeal
On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eris wrote:
>
> > On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
> >>that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
> >>that is sustained on ap
Eris wrote:
On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
that is sustained on appeal.
Spurious comma.
Disagree.
On 11/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
>that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
>that is sustained on appeal.
Spurious comma.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if th
I wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Formalize judicial findings
(AI = 3, please)
This should probably be two separate proposals. First one:
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by appending this text:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is not appealed within the t
Proto-Proposal: Formalize judicial findings
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by appending this text:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
that is sustained on appeal.
Amend Rule
18 matches
Mail list logo
