On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 14:14 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> What’s the issue this solves? I’m having a rough morning, and I can’t
> see the problem.
It means that you don't incur a rules violation in the situation that
the rules compel you to do something, but you have no way to do so.
We used to d
This resolves your problem with having to issue cards for bad reasons.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
>> Title: You SHAL
On Sep 23, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Title: You SHALL, unless it is ILLEGAL.
> Power: 2
> Author: PSS
> Text: {
> Append to the end of Item 7 in "Mother, May I?", by removing the period and
> inserting the following string in its place, the following text:
> ",
Title: You SHALL, unless it is ILLEGAL.
Power: 2
Author: PSS
Text: {
Append to the end of Item 7 in "Mother, May I?", by removing the period and
inserting the following string in its place, the following text:
", unless performing the described action is ILLEGAL."
}
Publius Scribonius Scholas
On 5/8/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. MUST NOT (syn. MAY NOT, SHALL NOT, ILLEGAL, PROHIBITED)
Attempts to perform the described action are successful,
but violate the rules.
This definition is incorrect.
Prohibition does not imply possibility. The
Several of the terms that you define are already used to define the
behaviour of artificial entities, rather than only to constrain player
actions. Or do you intend that they only have the formal meaning when
capitalised?
You should add "MANDATORY" as an alternative for "MUST". Also, these
alter
Proto-Proposal: Mother, May I?
(AI = 3, please)
Create a rule titled "Mother, May I?" with Power 3 and this text:
The following terms are defined:
1. CANNOT (syn. IMPOSSIBLE, INEFFECTIVE, INVALID) Attempts to
perform the described action are unsuccessful.
2.
7 matches
Mail list logo